Pictures provided by: sixcyl
Also known as:
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2009-02-11 21:26 |
![]() Very nice and good film ![]() Interesting landscapes and transportation systems ![]() ![]() ![]() Wuppertal Schwebebahn ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() N.Y.City subway,.... already tagged with graffitis ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() New York ![]() Amsterdam ![]() ![]() ![]() The Ruhr ... at last Alice (Yella Rottländer) ![]() ![]() and her mother: Lisa Kreuzer (already seen in Radio On /movie_79773-Radio-On.html ) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Aircraft in this film: http://www.impdb.org/index.php?title=Alice_in_den_St%C3%A4dten -- Last edit: 2010-11-30 19:16:45 |
◊ 2009-02-11 21:38 |
Interesting pics indeed. Only one thing worry me sixcyl, though it is maybe not my business. I see that last time your pics are much smaller than in the past (but I bet that you still use the DVD as source). Why? You have changed some software? |
◊ 2009-02-11 21:44 |
Indeed, 2 months ago (around), I've changed the resizing of the pictures (downsizing to 520 x400 ) in order to take less space on the database... I think this size is good enough for a correct result, don't you think? ..and yes, i confirm always using DVD ![]() |
◊ 2009-02-11 22:02 |
I see your point of view. Yes in the new size still everything is well visible, but I must admit that I'll miss a bit those fullsize pics. ![]() |
◊ 2009-02-11 22:59 |
Ahh, that's a place best known as the IRT Flushing Line. Not sure which station, although I've got a guess or two. Unless EL-AL and L'Avianca also stopped at LaGuardia Airport, it probably is. |
◊ 2009-02-12 10:51 |
That's useless... since the pictures are not stored in the database ![]() It makes background cars even more background ![]() Note that for 4:3 pictures, downsizing is good, but these are too small: I usually recommend 640x480 for such pictures. Since these are often older movies, with lower picture quality, the full 720x540 size is not useful and makes big files. -- Last edit: 2009-02-12 10:55:01 |
◊ 2009-02-12 21:52 |
binmerdalors...! moi pas comprendo, si ça sert à rien de passer en 550x400 , j'va donc reviendre en full 720x540 alors? ... et pourquoi ça ferait des "big files" ? ... tu dis une chose et son contraire? ou j'comprends rien? ... (c'est sûrement ça) |
◊ 2009-02-13 19:35 |
Benh parce que justement pour du 4:3 c'est bien de réduire, mais pas de réduire autant. 640x480 pour le 4:3, 720x... pour les images 16/9 et au-dessus. Et je dis que ça ne sert à rien pour la base de données, mais l'espace-disque n'est pas pour autant à gaspiller. -- Last edit: 2009-02-13 19:35:37 |