1968 Peugeot 204 Taxi
1968 Peugeot 204 in La maison de campagne, Movie, 1969
Class: Cars, Sedan — Model origin: 
01:23:53 ![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Background vehicle
Comments about this vehicle
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2015-07-31 08:04 |
Et tant pis pour le break DS à gauche. La 204 est d'ailleurs peut-être un break aussi. Ça se faisait volontiers chez les taxis à l'époque, non ? |
|
◊ 2015-07-31 10:01 |
Faut voir si le reflet dans la porte vitrée de l'hôtel est celui de la Peugeot. Si oui, la séquence permettrait peut-être d'en voir un peu plus, sans acteur devant. |
|
◊ 2015-07-31 16:50 |
Ah oui, Exiv. Je n'ai pas le film sous la main pour le moment. Je verrai ce soir s'il y a quelque chose à tirer de cette vitre. |
|
◊ 2015-08-02 04:32 |
![[Image: girault69maison113.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/17160/girault69maison113.jpg) C'est une berline. Merci, Exiv ! |
|
◊ 2015-08-02 04:50 |
Pour a date… 65+ a priori. Mais https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peugeot_204#Historique : And, about the trim, I fall here /vehicle_575689-Peugeot-204-1966.html on certain message delivered by one of our main asset: So, would we have a 66+ GL? |
|
◊ 2015-08-02 05:57 |
 I always think that 204s with over-riders are very very early - can't explain/prove it - just an impression. But "nouvelles roues pour les modèles 1966" is intriguing. What did 1965 wheels look like?? Perhaps like this https://www.flickr.com/photos/jano2106/3852245114 - flat centres, mirror finish, thick border, general shape sits further out. So what did 1966+ wheels look like - [edit - duplicated link removed. New one in comment below] - recessed centres, less of a mirror effect, bigger knob in middle, general flatter shape. If this is true, I think this car has 1965 wheels -- Last edit: 2015-08-02 23:28:33 |
|
◊ 2015-08-02 06:10 |
You, drunken Pict you! You gave twice the same link while I'm thirst-dying to know the difference between '65 and '66 204 wheels! |
|
◊ 2015-08-02 23:27 |
Oh fish-hooks. Can't find the post-1966 picture I was looking at last night, but this is similar full rear bumper http://p2.storage.canalblog.com/21/43/570736/45290361.jpg and I've now found a split bumper rear (with over-riders) with what I think are the newer wheels http://p2.storage.canalblog.com/25/17/570736/51799208.jpg So do we have a sequence ??? - March 65 introduction with 1st wheels and split bumpers as https://www.flickr.com/photos/jano2106/3852245114 - Sept 65 2nd wheels, still with split bumper (and when Break appeared, so all Breaks should have 2nd wheels) - Sept 66 revised rear, continuing 2nd wheels I could be dreaming all this, but there's still the French comment about new wheels for 1966 models to explain. And I wasn't pished, honest. |
|
◊ 2015-08-02 23:53 |
… (Frowning, grabbing his head, controling his breath)… So… ours… appears… to be… a 65, first set of wheels, right? (Suddenly realizing that it was what the sober Pict said first place… Silently quitting the place…) |
|
◊ 2015-08-02 23:55 |
("Sept 65" means, I think, Salon de l'auto, i.e. MY 66. No confusion with this, to me. But let me return to my silent capitonized cell.) (… Mmmh, actually, what is obvious is that the car on my pic is much too small!) -- Last edit: 2015-08-02 23:57:51 |
|
◊ 2025-07-15 20:00 |
1968 MY ('Paris-Pinin' extra badge on bonnet). |
