Class: Cars, Sedan — Model origin:
Background vehicle
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2007-09-08 22:07 |
Ford Tempo? |
◊ 2007-09-09 02:31 |
That's what it looks like to me is a second generation Tempo |
◊ 2007-09-09 21:39 |
idk if this is a tempo but it KINDA looks like a 88-94. |
◊ 2007-09-16 18:13 |
i dont really think this is a tempo, the rear window is kinda rounded whereas the tempo rear window is flat. |
◊ 2007-12-02 18:19 |
A little editing to the brightness:![]() |
◊ 2008-03-17 16:07 |
Is it a 1985 Mazda 626? |
◊ 2008-07-28 22:58 |
Well? |
◊ 2008-08-24 21:13 |
tempo. |
◊ 2010-12-12 17:10 |
yeah i'd say Tempo/Topaz |
◊ 2016-03-12 17:57 |
New pic shows this is not a Tempo. Looks like an Escort to me. |
◊ 2016-03-25 14:08 |
I agree. Escort or maybe Mercury Tracer - 91'-96' |
◊ 2019-06-15 03:27 |
The first year for the Sedan was 1992, not 1991. However, the white strip makes it a Mercury Tracer, not a Ford Escort. |
◊ 2019-06-15 04:19 |
Yep that is not a hatch rear. Only one little window behind the back door. |
◊ 2024-07-28 21:15 |
1991 was actually the first year for the Tracer Sedan, only that Escort Sedan starting in 1992 happened... ![]() |
◊ 2024-07-28 21:35 |
Yes, Ford Motor Co was trying to give each brand different product, with Ford brand getting the hatchbacks and Mercury getting the sedan. But since all the competition sold more sedans than hatchbacks, the Ford brand dealers complained and petitioned for an Escort sedan, which is why it arrived later. Lightened: ![]() -- Last edit: 2024-07-28 21:36:20 |