Caterpillar D3
Caterpillar D3 in The Amsterdam Kill, Movie, 1977
Class: Others, Construction & Engineering vehicle — Model origin: 
01:18:43 ![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Vehicle used by a character or in a car chase
Comments about this vehicle
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2013-06-07 08:21 |
![[Image: graafmasjien2.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/909/graafmasjien2.jpg) |
|
◊ 2013-11-21 18:36 |
its ID is written above the grill but the extremely pour image quality prevents read it -- Last edit: 2013-11-21 18:37:37 |
|
◊ 2014-01-29 18:44 |
this here could be the KOMATSU logo , would be clearly visible with decent pic quality and the twin cylinder mechanism also looks strongly like Komatsu , like on this D31 http://img.machinio.com/eqm/190368.jpg Link to "www.truck1.eu" ![[Image: untitled.jpg]](http://s9.postimg.org/idqk7i0yz/untitled.jpg "http://s9.postimg.org/idqk7i0yz/untitled.jpg") -- Last edit: 2014-01-29 18:44:41 |
|
-- ◊ 2014-01-31 14:01 |
This is the most random guess I've ever seen. To other mods: don't rename this from unknown. -- Last edit: 2014-01-31 14:08:29 |
|
◊ 2014-01-31 14:15 |
Kegare what the heck are you drinking ?? why random guess ? look at this, I am talking about the blade machnism, there is one cylinder were the arrow is and one at front of it , in combination with same looking chassis with 1 space wheel on top Link to "assets.cougar.nineentertainment.com.au" now go on prove the contrary by findins that mechanims and chassis on a bulldozer from different producer -- Last edit: 2014-01-31 14:19:31 |
|
◊ 2014-01-31 14:17 |
What is "drikinging?"  |
|
-- ◊ 2014-01-31 14:23 |
I don't have to prove anything to you. If it were me you were banned by now. Yeah I know how a hydraulic system looks and it sure doesn't look like it says Komatsu on that incomprehensible piece of paint or dirt on the door window. |
|
◊ 2014-01-31 14:35 |
the way you said it makes it sould like it comes out out of pure air with total random guess look yourself closer, and BTW why should I be banned ? ![[Image: untitled.514.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/13592/untitled.514.jpg) is this really ?? -- Last edit: 2014-01-31 14:40:10 |
|
◊ 2014-01-31 14:45 |
and BTW it's not on the door window, it's on the body visible thur the door glass , see garco thumbnail -- Last edit: 2014-01-31 14:45:55 |
|
◊ 2014-01-31 15:49 |
Come on, a large part of the identifications seem right. But I agree that seeing this one I was not convinced at all. -- Last edit: 2014-01-31 15:50:29 |
|
◊ 2014-01-31 15:53 |
you guys aren't convinced that its a Komatsu it's OK I don't mind that but saying as if this was a pure hot air claim from me without any thought whatsoever is really insulting like I was some Gomsel or some other news who pour out stuff with no really thought -- Last edit: 2014-01-31 15:53:30 |
|
-- ◊ 2014-01-31 16:09 |
Looks like it to me. You never take your time to think, and you always hurry up and post several comments one after another on a vehicle page until one of them ends up being close to a straight fact. What is annoying me is that you insist for vehicles to be renamed basing on what it looks like an incomprehensible detail, this photo for example. That paint stain could be anything. Not even Gomsel used to guess basing on such facts, tom11 did and not even him was so insistent about it like you are. -- Last edit: 2014-01-31 16:15:02 |
|
◊ 2014-01-31 16:21 |
On the other hand he identified so many vehicles that no-one cared about. It is not like he was only posting guesses (but I agree that sometimes they look like that). Tom11 was banned for other comments, not for the guess-like identifications (and many seemed right, in the end). -- Last edit: 2014-01-31 16:22:00 |
|
-- ◊ 2014-01-31 16:25 |
Did he? There are only a few users who could contradict him in this field. Some already did with Soviet road rollers. And then he just edited his previous IDs and/or deleted his comments after proven wrong. -- Last edit: 2014-01-31 16:28:20 |
|
◊ 2014-01-31 16:34 |
excuse me but of those 5 soviet rollers only 1 was directly ID by me , other were already pre ID and you forget that on this bulldozer I also based on the mechanism and track chassis which is consistent with Komatsu not just a blureed logo you make it sound like that blurred logo was my sole claim for its ID -- Last edit: 2014-01-31 16:36:06 |
|
◊ 2014-01-31 16:53 |
here Kegare since you mention soviet rollers this ones I had nothing to do with /vehicle_333656-RZDM-D-260.html /vehicle_665502-RZDM-D-260.html /vehicle_660392-RZDM-D-83.html /vehicle_596258-RZDM-D-260.html this one I mis ID /vehicle_372978-RZDM-D-83.html so explain how I was responsable for their MIS ID ?? -- Last edit: 2014-01-31 17:01:33 |
|
◊ 2014-02-12 22:08 |
well well I did find a source for footage for this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmebzganeNI I hate to admit it but I was wrong, this is a CATERPILALR D3 found a good enough frame to rear LAR as the last letters and there there is one model in thei range which fits it , the D3 - notice the slope ahead of the cab - that sideways grip ahead of the cab - air filter just ahead of slope on the left side - the mechanism which is nearly identical to Komatsu one - track chassis and engine hood concerning the black grill here is a D3 with same one Link to "twentywheels.com" ![[Image: untitled.jpg]](http://s14.postimg.org/aq2f1jz99/untitled.jpg "http://s14.postimg.org/aq2f1jz99/untitled.jpg") here tried to enhance the script , the L is clearly visible ![[Image: untitled.340.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/13592/untitled.340.jpg) -- Last edit: 2014-02-12 22:08:52 |
|
◊ 2014-02-15 17:36 |
Cat D3 http://d323w7klwy72q3.cloudfront.net/i/a/2013/20130314const/E5892.JPG |
