impdb.org

IGCD

[ Login ]

Lady and the Tramp II: Scamp's Adventure, Animation Movie, 2001

Pictures provided by: Gamer

Where to find this title?

Comments about this movie

See all comments about this movie and its vehicles

Author	Message
Gamer ◊ 2017-12-10 14:35	Trying not to sound like stevil101 here, but I figured I'd add this since the vehicles are very realistic looking for being brass-era cars. Generic: Anyone? -- Last edit: 2017-12-10 15:03:52
GodzillaFan54 ◊ 2017-12-11 04:36	Yeah sure, take a movie you made in 1955 and make a sequel 46 years later...
Gamer ◊ 2017-12-11 08:07	Bambi came out in 1942 and Bambi II in 2006
Pokeoddsponge ◊ 2017-12-11 11:51	For a while, Disney was in a slump and more or less doing exclusively direct-to-video sequels to old movies
Gamer ◊ 2017-12-11 12:09	This is definitely one of the better ones.
GodzillaFan54 ◊ 2017-12-12 02:40	Gamer wrote Bambi came out in 1942 and Bambi II in 2006 THat makes even less sense. All the kids who saw the original back than would all be elderly. That's a gap of 64 years... gotta be some kind of record.
GodzillaFan54 ◊ 2017-12-12 02:42	pokeoddsponge wrote For a while, Disney was in a slump and more or less doing exclusively direct-to-video sequels to old movies So they were essentially cashing in on the names of their beloved classic films by making unnecessary 40+-years-too-late sequels. The fact that they were all direct-to-video seems to make it worse. -- Last edit: 2017-12-12 02:42:48
GodzillaFan54 ◊ 2017-12-12 02:44	Than again, their target audience were kids who had no clue or care when the originals was made. Hell, I watched 101 Dalmations 2: Patch's London Adventure over and over as a kid.
Gamer ◊ 2017-12-12 08:11	GodzillaFan54 wrote That's a gap of 64 years... gotta be some kind of record. Quote It holds the world record for the longest span of time between two consecutive installments of a franchise, being released 64 years after the original film came out in 1942.
train68 ◊ 2018-07-15 19:57	I find some of these direct-to-video sequels quite good. Just not this one.

Add a comment