Advertising Last completed movie pages
unknown 
Ep. 5.02Class: Trucks, Simple truck
![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Minor action vehicle or used in only a short scene
Comments about this vehicle| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2015-11-15 22:49 |
this can't be solved... |
|
◊ 2015-11-15 23:12 |
i know, but we need to keep it as it plays a role. |
|
◊ 2015-11-15 23:30 |
would be better in comments |
|
◊ 2015-11-15 23:47 |
(^ This is what we, specialists of the subject, call "Phase 1". Study/demonstration to be continued…) |
|
◊ 2015-11-16 00:10 |
Not sure if i understand what you mean. This is not my first contribution and i know what i do. I dont contribute Cars that are too much background. When i have scenes with many cars, i always pick out the most interesting or best visible instead of uploading every car in that scene. When that contribution is approved, i ask in comment if other vehicles in that scene are interesting to add. Some background cars which are not interesting for the majority of users, but that COULD be interesting for others, get into the comment section on the main page. So i see no typical error here. I mean we could say that about most of the unknowns, especially the older ones. We have several "Forever unknowns", yet some proved to be still solveable. |
|
◊ 2015-11-16 01:11 |
What he means is that because the cab of the truck is not visible, it is virtually impossible to positively ID. Because he doesn't like entries like this, he always asks to move them to the comments, even for vehicles with roles. The admins are divided on which way is better, so don't worry about it. |
|
◊ 2015-11-16 10:03 |
Yeah our Saint Mikey... i remember his history now. Our specialist. There is always a 1 % chance to ID something. This truck is owned by the austrian company Bodner Bau. Maybe if we find someone who knows more about this company and their trucks, he can tell us the model. I could also ask them all myself, but i think its already too long ago as anyone could remember. |
|
◊ 2015-11-19 18:07 |
(Naturally—but I admit it doesn't read obvious—I was not talking about you, Purzel89, but of your fellow IMCDber.) |
Add a comment Advertising Advertising
