1973 Buick LeSabre

1973 Buick LeSabre in Top Gear: The Worst Car in the History of the World, Documentary, 2012 IMDB

Class: Cars, Coupé — Model origin: US

1973 Buick LeSabre

[*][*][*] Vehicle used by a character or in a car chase 

Comments about this vehicle

AuthorMessage

Sinatra BR

2012-11-18 02:57

1973 Buick

carcrasher88 US

2012-11-18 03:00

Electra?

rjluna2 US

2012-11-22 16:40

Curiously, this one has amber/white indicators :think:

Gag Halfrunt UK

2012-11-22 16:44

Looks as if the car is registered in the UK but has an unofficial (and unlawful) American style number plate.

electra225 IT

2012-11-22 18:07

Why one of the worst ???

Lateef NO

2012-11-22 18:15

Because Top Gear

Q-Ball JP

2012-11-22 18:59

Clarkson and his team are VERY funny, but they need to realize that big American 70's land barges weren't meant to do autocross and go around the test track.
The LeSabre is still a classic, and I hope Clarkson didn't do anything too maniacal to it.

Nightrider RU

2012-11-23 09:21

And they still don't know that suspension tuning can make wonders...

CougarTim US

2012-11-24 21:46

How can you hate a car so unapologetic about its shortcomings? It never claims to be anything other than what it is: a big and comfortable cruiser with an engine bigger than the typical London flat and a thirst greater than a drunk Scotsman.

Sandie SX

2012-11-24 21:48

I doubt that, I'm sure I could down a pint of petrol more quickly than the Buick.

Andre Malraux

2012-11-24 21:52

deleted comment

Commander 57 US

2012-11-24 21:52

One of the classiest fronts of its time period.

chicomarx BE

2012-11-25 00:37

Yes, another Top Gear Hastily Cobbled Together for a Fast Buck Special. I quite like these Buicks too.

philr CA

2012-11-26 10:10

At least, it seemed to handle much better than the Lincoln that Clarkson was driving... I used to have a '74 LeSabre and it handled pretty well for a full size car! And mine didn't have the "Stage1" package or the "Ride and Performance" package that were available on the LeSabre that year. Too bad they don't compare this average family car on the track with an average British family car from the same period! Maybe it's because they didn't find British cars from 1973 that were still running well enough to test them on the track!

chicomarx BE

2012-11-26 19:17

PhilR wrote Maybe it's because they didn't find British cars from 1973 that were still running well enough to test them on the track!

Zing!

UMD 71L
Date of Liability 01 04 2013
Date of First Registration 26 01 1993
Year of Manufacture 1973
Cylinder Capacity (cc) 5700cc
Fuel Type PETROL
Vehicle Status Licence Not Due
Vehicle Colour GREEN

dsl SX

2012-11-26 21:00

Or because British owners of 70s British cars have realised that TG only want to drop pianos on them, swing them from cranes, fill them full of water until they explode, or other jolly japes. It is an understandable reaction.

caioficetech BR

2012-12-07 13:11

Terrible car, doesn't drive properly, terribly made...

Cars from the US are made to STAY in the US, the speed limit is 65mph, big lanes (Usually Straight), cheap fuel so you don't care for small cars that are neat to drive on mountain passes. You want a confortable saloon, with loads of space that can drive off the shooping mall as quickly as possible to the 45mph speed limit of the city roads...

-- Last edit: 2012-12-07 13:12:07

matt trakker

2013-02-16 06:09

^Clearly you know nothing about them.

Any car on this platform from that generation of GM car can handle well with the addition of Bilstein 1104/0929, the addition of a rear anti-sway bar, and if desired, different springs along with wider low profile tires.

It's apples and oranges. Those cars were built as an open-road or boulevard cruiser. They aren't the best ever made, in fact quality control was a joke back then, but how many European and Japanese cars of the same vintage do you see cruising around?

Charger1968 US

2013-05-20 15:09

Clarkson is stupid. The only thing which he can do its drive fast on the track.

kudos SX

2014-08-14 20:04

[Image: lincoln2.jpg] [Image: lincoln3.jpg] [Image: lincoln4.jpg] [Image: lincoln5.jpg] [Image: lincoln6.jpg] [Image: lincoln7.jpg] [Image: lincoln13.jpg] [Image: lincoln18.jpg] [Image: lincoln19.jpg] [Image: lincoln20.jpg]

Reg1992 US

2017-08-03 12:41

matt trakker wrote ^Clearly you know nothing about them.

Any car on this platform from that generation of GM car can handle well with the addition of Bilstein 1104/0929, the addition of a rear anti-sway bar, and if desired, different springs along with wider low profile tires.

It's apples and oranges. Those cars were built as an open-road or boulevard cruiser. They aren't the best ever made, in fact quality control was a joke back then, but how many European and Japanese cars of the same vintage do you see cruising around?


In 1973 quality control was not a "joke", it was perfectly fine for the standards of that time. The cars people complained about the quality were some of the compact cars GM tried to make (the Chevette, Citation, Vega, Pinto, etc). The full-size vehicles were mostly fine, though. Big and comfortable, if not maybe fuel-inefficient but otherwise excellent vehicles.

Personally I love the Buicks of this vintage. Nothing wrong with them at all. As others pointed out, they just weren't made to drive like a supercar or anything like that.

johnfromstaffs EN

2017-08-03 13:13

What's a GM Pinto?

Reg1992 US

2017-08-03 13:14

johnfromstaffs wrote What's a GM Pinto?

Whoops :whistle:

Baube QC

2017-08-03 13:18

i guess its about same as a Ford Monza.. ;)

johnfromstaffs EN

2017-08-03 13:18

Sorry, but I never can resist a leg pull when I get the chance.

the sad biker UK

2017-08-03 13:37

I love big old Yankee barges, unfortunately the end of the power wars in 69-70 and the fuel crisis coincided with the stylists developing eyesight problems.

Commander 57 US

2017-08-03 15:07

I have lived with an driven cars from every decade from the 1950's to the present.
Our 1970's machines were a 1971 Ford LTD Brougham, a 1973 Dodge Dart Swinger Special and a 1975 Buick LeSabre. All gave good service and had no significant quality control problems. We took care of them and they took care of us.
I have found that proper treatment of a car and following the recommended maintenance schedules is much more important than the particular year or make of a vehicle.

CadillacFleetwood75 US

2018-02-15 01:48

Compared (ridiculously) to a modern BMW 5 Series. If they had compared the 5 series to a Buick Regal it would have been a much more fair test. Or if they had compared the old LeSabre to a '73 full size BMW.

Add a comment

You must login to post comments...

Advertising