1986 Toyota Van LE [YR22]

1986 Toyota Van [YR22] in Rush Hour, Movie, 1998 IMDB

Class: Cars, Van / MPV — Model origin: JP — Made for: USA

1986 Toyota Van LE [YR22]

[*] Background vehicle 

Comments about this vehicle

AuthorMessage

Neon IT

2010-05-02 23:14

Free choice!

G-MANN UK

2010-05-02 23:16

Unless something stands out, I'm not sure it's worth listing traffic jam shots like this.

Neon IT

2010-05-02 23:19

The Toyota Van (for example) is well visible...

G-MANN UK

2010-05-02 23:20

But boring and ugly :p To the me the nicest car is the Mercedes SL but it's a bit small.

Lateef NO

2010-05-02 23:25

No deal, the Toyota Van is way more interesting than the SL IMHO. If it was up to me, I'd list the Van or the 1987-91 Camry.

G-MANN UK

2010-05-02 23:31

Lateef wrote No deal, the Toyota Van is way more interesting than the SL IMHO.


I just can't believe how people on this site keep saying crazy things like this :lol: Yes, a boxy 1980s Japanese van is definetely more interesting than a Mercedes SL [:crazy]

Turbocobrajet IT

2010-05-02 23:36

There is a Mercedes C-Klasse [W202]

taxiguy US

2010-05-02 23:39

G-MANN wrote

I just can't believe how people on this site keep saying crazy things like this :lol: Yes, a boxy 1980s Japanese van is definetely more interesting than a Mercedes SL [:crazy]


It's more uncommon and there are far less of them listed, and that's what counts on this site. Subjective opinions don't. I wish you'd start to understand that after all these years.


-- Last edit: 2010-05-02 23:41:07

G-MANN UK

2010-05-02 23:41

It's just funny the way people keep saying "more interesting". They don't say "less common on this site" :D

Lateef NO

2010-05-03 06:41

What's the matter? Am I the only person who likes these things?

Ford_Guy US

2010-05-03 10:48

I agree with G-MANN in a way. The general norm is to list the cars that are less commonly listed on the site in cases like these. One's personal opinion shouldn't matter as we all have different opinions here. But "less common on this site" would be more appropriate than "more interesting" in order to be subjective.

I would have listed this in the comments section for the main page, but at least the image is of good quality :)

Lateef NO

2010-05-03 14:57

Ok, just to make myself clear, I'm not incompetent or something. When I said it's way more interesting, then that's what I meant. I think the Van is way more futuristic and nice-looking than the SL. If you guys have a problem with that, fine, I'm not willing to argue any further on that. If I wanted to point out it's less common on the site I would have said that.

93montero

2011-01-25 05:44

No one cares about the Aerostar :) ;) :D

Lateef NO

2014-05-29 20:06

1986-89 LE

-- Last edit: 2014-05-29 20:23:08

Add a comment

You must login to post comments...

Advertising