1972 Mazda 618 Coupé [616]
Comments about this vehicle
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2006-12-03 05:18 |
Mazda RX3? |
◊ 2006-12-03 05:18 |
1971-73 Mazda RX-2 : http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/5/web/617000-617999/617027_2.jpg |
◊ 2006-12-04 22:40 |
its a background vehicle |
◊ 2006-12-04 23:52 |
Waiting for Modell's comment... |
◊ 2006-12-06 06:59 |
It gets smashed during the chase scene. So yes, it's two stars. Same thing happens to the 1973 Lincoln Town Car. |
◊ 2006-12-07 19:46 |
the fact they hit it doesnt mean its used in a minor scene...well i think ..... |
◊ 2006-12-07 22:04 |
But that is what two stars are for... ![]() |
◊ 2006-12-07 22:40 |
Usually for cars that are not driven, I put 1 star, even if they are hit, as I consider that they are part of background. But it is not easy to decide what to do with these ![]() -- Last edit: 2006-12-07 22:40:35 |
◊ 2006-12-07 22:45 |
well for me its a 1 star |
◊ 2006-12-08 00:07 |
So, this should be one star, then? /vehicle_6751-Oldsmobile-Aurora.html |
◊ 2006-12-08 00:16 |
Are you joking? if you mean the Aurora its clearly being used dont you see it? |
◊ 2006-12-08 03:06 |
What I mean to say is that the car does have something to do with the chase. It's not just something you see driving by in the background. If you take a look at the discussion on this page, Antp had stated that even if a certain car is undamaged, it can still get two stars- /vehicle_38051-Buick-Estate-Wagon-1974.html |
◊ 2006-12-08 09:34 |
Yes but think a bit, you are comparing this car or the lincoln with the aurora in Matrix which is clearly used and deserves 2 stars just because you see it few minutes in a whole sequence, so that is a car sued in minor action, but this one above and the lincoln are not, they are just hit, they are not driven at all. |
◊ 2006-12-08 10:21 |
But that car was driven, it was "acting" ![]() |
◊ 2006-12-08 11:03 |
exactly |
◊ 2023-09-03 22:24 |
Cheap wheels with wheelcovers, no Wankel badge - it's 618 Coupe. |