Advertising Last completed movie pages 1961 Land-Rover 109'' Series IIa Pickup ex Carmichael Fire Tender Ep. 1Class: Cars, Pick-up — Model origin: 
![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Vehicle used by a character or in a car chase
Comments about this vehicle| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2008-02-06 21:40 |
![[Image: landrover2zf9.6854.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/0is267/landrover2zf9.6854.jpg) ![[Image: landrover3ag3.1066.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/0is267/landrover3ag3.1066.jpg) |
|
◊ 2008-02-06 22:05 |
![[Image: landrover1cu8.5803.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/0is338/landrover1cu8.5803.jpg) Ep.3 |
|
◊ 2008-02-08 17:12 |
Whatever it is, it looks like a Series II. |
|
◊ 2008-02-10 22:01 |
This is either a series 2 or an early 2a judging by the deep sills on the vehicle. |
|
◊ 2008-02-21 17:41 |
serie 2 a http://www.glencoyne.co.uk/images/series2a.jpg |
|
◊ 2008-02-21 20:02 |
I wouldn't argue with 2A, but I'll be interested to see what Alexander has to say about this. (  Alex!) Why does it have that hatch on the side? And why does it have a British Q-prefix registration, issued to vehicles previously registered elsewhere whose date of first reg. is unknown ... including ex-MoD vehicles? |
|
◊ 2008-02-21 23:16 |
Q plates were issued to ex-MOD vehicles from time to time, however this one doesn't have any military features. The shelf things on the side are like nothing I have seen before, though at a wild guess it could have served as a fire tender in a factory or similar, and nto registered until it was sold on, hence the Q plate. Other than that, looks like a standard Series II/early IIa 109" to me -- Last edit: 2008-02-21 23:18:13 |
|
◊ 2008-02-22 11:55 |
Calum, I think you have got it spot on. These open sides are typical for Carmichael Fire Tenders. Originally the hose connectors would have been there.![[Image: wxe2675b4dc31brk0.6185.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/0is67/wxe2675b4dc31brk0.6185.jpg) It seems the white side lights are of the raised type, which were -- if I am right -- only introduced with the Series IIa in 1961. |
|
◊ 2008-03-12 18:05 |
Ah, recognise it now!! Probably an FT/3 or FT/4. Though you can't tell, because both have different setups (I believe the one Alex has posted is a FT/2??) |
Add a comment Advertising Advertising
