Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2017-11-30 14:20 |
|
◊ 2017-11-30 14:21 |
Audi by default as it sponsored the movie |
◊ 2017-11-30 14:24 |
Since Audi is a part of Volkswagen, it could be a VW... |
◊ 2017-11-30 14:27 |
What's the point of that, sorry? This is an older car and visible by the interior only, so where is the product placement? And it's definitely not an Audi - Neptune said here (look, this is not an Audi ) that it could be a Ford Taurus |
◊ 2017-11-30 14:31 |
My point, was that VWs are less expensive than Audis and if this is a real and not CGI, I'd sink a VW before an Audi. Perhaps these are just ravings of not getting enough sleep last night.. |
◊ 2017-11-30 14:38 |
But why does this have to be an Audi or VW by default? Why not a Taurus or another make? |
◊ 2017-11-30 14:42 |
because it's not that visible ? |
◊ 2017-11-30 15:09 |
Oh, I give up. |
◊ 2017-11-30 17:00 |
@mike962 - What do you mean by "Audi sponsored the movie"? Was there a credit at the end of film stating such or did you see this on the tv where Audi may have purchased commercials. |
◊ 2017-11-30 17:00 |
^ have you seen the movie ? then you know furthermore -- Last edit: 2017-11-30 17:03:39 |
◊ 2017-11-30 18:46 |
That doesn't mean the vehicle at the bottom is an Audi. It could be anything. Product placement usually means that the product placed is shown in the most favorable conditions to the product placer. Underwater and smashed is not favorable. |
◊ 2017-11-30 18:49 |
either way should be in comments unless someone can actually ID the door lock of the door -- Last edit: 2017-11-30 19:19:11 |
◊ 2017-11-30 19:19 |
if it can help |
◊ 2017-11-30 22:06 |
Then why comment in the first place saing "Audi by default", when it's clear that you don't possess the necessary skills to crack it anyway? |
◊ 2017-11-30 22:14 |
^ you ever heard of sarcasm ? nobody was capable to ID this which is actually even more visible /vehicle_82076.html -- Last edit: 2017-11-30 22:18:43 |
◊ 2017-11-30 22:18 |
|
◊ 2017-11-30 22:30 |
Thanks for the extra light, the interior door locks look like the ones that Chrysler used. Plus it seems like a big sedan in the 2nd thumbnail so I'd say possibly an LH platform. |
◊ 2017-12-01 07:12 |
1993-1996 Dodge Intrepid? Interior looks very basic. |
◊ 2017-12-02 05:34 |
I agree with Intrepid. I had a '94. |
◊ 2017-12-05 21:12 |
My car has exactly the same car lock, thats definitely a Chrysler/Dodge/Plymouth LH platform. My car is a Chrysler Stratus btw. |
◊ 2017-12-05 21:14 |
Hey Purzel, I just read your profile, when did you sit in a 1919 Stanley? This would really interest me. -- Last edit: 2017-12-05 21:16:13 |
◊ 2017-12-05 21:31 |
It was at a steam machine exhbition at the Ziegeleipark Mildenberg. We saw this car in the closing hours of the exhibition and the owner decided to give me and my father a last trip to the exit. More about the story here: Link to "imcdb.kelcommunity.be" |
◊ 2019-07-04 03:52 |
[LH]. No exterior shots so I can't narrow it. |
◊ 2019-12-18 22:28 |
Wouldn't this be a Chrysler in Canada? |