Advertising
Last completed movie pages
Comments about this movie| Related page | Author | Message | Date | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
rtsbusman1997 ![]() | Made for CDN | 2022-07-10 03:46 | ||
Terra ![]() | Very poor image but this is a later 2001-2004. That color combination was not in any 1999 or 2000 brochure. | 2019-05-18 18:22 | ||
rtsbusman1997 ![]() | [E-250]. | 2013-01-23 05:18 | ||
rtsbusman1997 ![]() | 1993-1994 then. | 2012-07-11 02:04 | ||
Lucas_gt8 ![]() | Savanna FC3S(1985-1990) | 2011-03-24 14:05 | ||
Draelren ![]() | 1989-1991 RX-7 | 2010-07-03 06:03 | ||
mercurygrandmarquis1 ![]() | most of the rts fleet is nova bus most of the tmcs are long retired |
2009-08-26 13:47 | ||
IRT_BMT_IND ![]() | If it's recent footage it's a Nova or TMC, but movies often use older stock footage. Most of the current RTS fleet in New York is TMC, so it should probably just be tagged as that. | 2009-04-12 06:43 | ||
Animatronixx ![]() | W203 2000+ | 2009-03-18 23:12 | ||
bh ![]() | I understood what it meant, but thanks. Glad it's fixed now. |
2009-03-17 06:16 | ||
Snookie ![]() | Actually this one looks pretty good! -- Last edit: 2009-03-17 03:41:20 |
2009-03-17 03:41 | ||
ford_guy ![]() | Indeed, those Falcons definitely take the cake ![]() |
2009-03-16 22:58 | ||
atom ![]() | It's the orange part of the indicator/repeater: ![]() |
2009-03-16 11:56 | ||
antp ![]() | Well I could not explain why Gen1 instead of Gen2 though, except using the reason given by Atom ![]() I do not know who is doing that, but for my curiosity what is US/CDN-spec visible? -- Last edit: 2009-03-16 10:38:33 |
2009-03-16 10:37 | ||
antp ![]() | The Ford Falcon fake NY taxis from Superman Returns were worse ![]() /vehicle_45018-Ford-Falcon-EA-1988.html |
2009-03-16 10:33 | ||
ford_guy ![]() | I was referring more to the 2000 model. All it needs is the grey bumpers. The black bodysides would have been correct for 2000. Besides, remember how I said "besides the most minute details." The numbers on the doors would be EXTREMELY minute ![]() Certainly this one is worse: /vehicle_174251-Ford-Crown-Victoria-P71-2000.html -- Last edit: 2009-03-16 04:45:46 |
2009-03-15 20:28 | ||
taxiguy ![]() | Aren't so bad?? Did you see the numbers written on the doors? And those black stripes on the bodysides, just so wrong. |
2009-03-15 19:44 | ||
atom ![]() | It's a Gen.2 I typed in the wrong number... | 2009-03-15 18:41 | ||
Neptune ![]() | Gen.1, Gen.2, Gen.3, Gen.4 and so on mean the generation of the vehicle. In this case the car is the second generation of the SAAB 900, hence (Gen.2) Other vehicles have Mk.1, Mk.2 and so on, or Series I, Series II and so on. Even other forms of generation classification are used on the site, but those three forms I listed are the most common I think. Antp could explain better ... -- Last edit: 2009-03-16 04:03:51 |
2009-03-15 17:21 | ||
bh ![]() | Why is it listed as Gen.I? | 2009-03-15 17:11 | ||
atom ![]() | Why do someone keep removing it??? | 2009-03-15 04:43 | ||
Neptune ![]() | Ahh, forgot that. | 2009-03-15 04:19 | ||
Snookie ![]() | possible Novabus RTS | 2009-03-15 04:03 | ||
ford_guy ![]() | I doubt it's a 2003+ model as the side turn lenses aren't fully amber as they would be on those newer models. | 2009-03-15 03:56 | ||
Neptune ![]() | I want to say this one is a 2003+ model in XL trim given the grille plastic is darkened like all XL trimmed 2003 onward models. But at this distance, I can’t be 100% sure. |
2009-03-15 03:47 | ||
ford_guy ![]() | Oh I'm sorry. It was indeed labeled as an F-350. And I changed it to the generic "E-Series" because I believe that it could be an E-450 too as some ambulances are E-450's. But this probably is an E-350 so I'll change it back. -- Last edit: 2009-03-15 03:15:57 |
2009-03-15 03:15 | ||
carchasesfanatic ![]() | Oh no it wasn't me, i just realize because of your comment that i wrote "F" instead of "E", but no i didn't label it as E-350 once you changed it, isn't it one though? | 2009-03-15 03:04 | ||
ford_guy ![]() | Yes, you did write that. Did you know if it was an E-350 for sure? I wasn't sure if you had been the one who put it in or not. I apologize though. | 2009-03-15 02:59 | ||
carchasesfanatic ![]() | Now you say that, i wrote F-350 didn't I ? silly me... | 2009-03-15 02:54 | ||
ford_guy ![]() | 1998-2002 | 2009-03-15 02:24 | ||
ford_guy ![]() | This is actually an E-Series. It looks to be from the 1997-2002 generation, so I couldn't tell you whether it's an Econoline or not. | 2009-03-15 02:23 | ||
Neptune ![]() | 2005+ model | 2009-03-15 02:23 | ||
ford_guy ![]() | These actually aren't so bad. Besides the more minute details, the only major thing I see wrong is that they don't have grey bumpers. But anyhow, the one in the main image and in the thumbnail on the second row is a 2001-2002 model. The one in the first two thumbnails and the last one is a 2000 model. |
2009-03-15 02:21 | ||
carchasesfanatic ![]() | haha ![]() |
2009-03-15 01:50 | ||
taxiguy ![]() | Extremely fake NYC taxis (all of them) I don't think I've seen ones so bad ever in the history of IMCDb -- Last edit: 2009-03-15 01:40:06 |
2009-03-15 01:39 | ||
Ddey65 ![]() | I can tell you it's an RTS. I'd love to say it was a GMC RTS, but I have my doubts. |
2009-03-15 01:05 | ||
marioman3138 ![]() | a Lincoln Navigaton is visable (center-bottom) IMT will be able to tell us the bus |
2009-03-14 23:31 | ||
Gag Halfrunt ![]() | Filmed in Canada. http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0974554/locations |
2009-03-14 23:27 | ||
atom ![]() | Made for USA Saw that it was filmed in Canada now, Made for CDN then. -- Last edit: 2009-03-14 22:26:45 |
2009-03-14 22:17 | ||
carchasesfanatic ![]() | ![]() |
2009-03-14 22:15 | ||
bh ![]() | 900. | 2009-03-14 21:34 | ||
jrh1982 ![]() | Mazda RX-7 | 2009-03-14 20:56 | ||
carchasesfanatic ![]() | Another one or even the same one a few minutes later.![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() -- Last edit: 2009-03-14 22:58:04 |
2009-03-14 19:24 |
Results pages
Advertising