Werbung Zuletzt erstellte Filmseiten
Kommentare über diesen Film - Page 1/3 [ Next ] | Verknüpfte Seite | Autor | Mitteilung | Datum | Aktion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JB  | Year is 1962+. Model is "Type 46F FOM". https://lautomobileancienne.com/citroen-type-46f-fom-1962-1967/ |
2020-08-27 08:07 | ||
| LVCDC | Aircraft play too an important part as you can see it on http://impdb.org/index.php?title=Les_aventuriers | 2015-09-09 15:26 | ||
dsl  | S3a-c with cowled headlights | 2015-07-30 13:47 | ||
eLMeR  | 1961 only park lamps. And depending on the wheelbase, it could be a C-Series too... ⇒ 1961 Chevrolet S-Series Superior Coach. -- Last edit: 2015-01-19 23:26:42 |
2015-01-19 23:24 | ||
electra225  | early one. '65? | 2013-11-03 15:34 | ||
| DidierF | Une autre, vue place de l’Étoile :![[Image: vlcsnap-2013-11-03-07h46m44s150.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/17160/vlcsnap-2013-11-03-07h46m44s150.jpg) |
2013-11-03 13:34 | ||
| DidierF | Oh, j'l'avais oubliée ! Time: 002846 |
2013-11-03 09:09 | ||
| DidierF | I gave the timings of the 36 pics. Before I erase my copy, I'll post one ![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small} 4CV, much sollicited for modern scuplture, and some you'll keep or not (but the Dynas deserve being here, I say!).It was ![[Image: vlcsnap-2013-11-03-06h25m19s22.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/17160/vlcsnap-2013-11-03-06h25m19s22.jpg) de Robert Enrico, un film que beaucoup de gens aiment beaucoup. Je ne suis pas du nombre. Ah, tout de même, une photo que j'aime bien, pour la photo qu'on y trouve à l'arrière plan, Jim et Colin : ![[Image: vlcsnap-2013-11-01-21h38m04s97.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/17160/vlcsnap-2013-11-01-21h38m04s97.jpg) -- Last edit: 2013-11-03 09:06:47 |
2013-11-03 08:50 | ||
| DidierF | À propos du "Fainéant", le re-voici, à peine mieux : ![[Image: vlcsnap-2013-11-01-20h56m12s15.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/17160/vlcsnap-2013-11-01-20h56m12s15.jpg) et en voilà un autre : ![[Image: vlcsnap-2013-11-03-06h33m45s1.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/17160/vlcsnap-2013-11-03-06h33m45s1.jpg) Main pic, Time: 003108 |
2013-11-03 08:02 | ||
| DidierF | By the way, it should be a : the car almost strikes Johanna Shimkus. -- Last edit: 2013-11-03 07:33:03 |
2013-11-03 07:32 | ||
| DidierF | Time: 000041 (Excellent jeu de mots, Bebert.) |
2013-11-03 06:48 | ||
| DidierF | Time: 000910 (C'est quoi,le coupé ou sedan 2 portes, derrière ? J'ai failli lui ouvrir sa page.) |
2013-11-03 06:46 | ||
DynaMike  | Actually Matra-Bonnet... | 2010-07-25 00:23 | ||
| Bruno58 | Richier C774 OR C782 : a front view must be necessary to see the difference | 2010-02-26 17:30 | ||
| DynaMike | Known as 'Die Abenteurer' in Germany (it is broadcatsed right now on Arte). | 2009-08-21 15:22 | ||
| DynaMike | Yes, 1953+ 11 B. | 2009-05-14 13:13 | ||
cl82  | Besides, are those the sad remains of a Citroen Traction Avant? | 2009-05-14 12:44 | ||
| ingo |  yellow bulbs, not yellow headlights. .gif ";)") |
2009-05-14 11:53 | ||
rjluna2  | With selective yellow headlights fitted in... | 2009-05-13 23:09 | ||
| garco | Pitty I removed the pictures I have download from the link in my previous message recently... | 2009-05-13 23:08 | ||
atom  | The movie is from 1967 so it can't be a 1969. | 2009-05-13 23:03 | ||
| Bruno58 | Benoto was really a french make (cranes and excavators), but i have no information enough to find the model. Sorry | 2009-05-13 23:01 | ||
| michel | Oui et sur la droite, on apercoit un Renault "tancarville". | 2007-07-08 19:25 | ||
| trellex | c'est une 66-67, nouveau logo en plastique écrit "renault4" sur le hayon, et la couleur gris clairpresque blanc indique la nouveauté 67 | 2007-06-20 19:42 | ||
| Buc84 | Engine looks like 1948-56 303/324 Oldsmobile "Rocket" V-8?? (Definately NOT a Chevy or a Mopar Hemi) Also: If it's an Olds,it's also the wrong color....should be Green or maybe also Gold | 2007-04-24 03:55 | ||
| supcoach | The old girl has a Superior Coach body | 2006-12-25 22:16 | ||
junkman  | Richier | 2006-12-20 16:37 | ||
antp  | DS is not a problem, as they are grouped. I was thinking to some special cases like the Break 20 for example  But even if I find these names annoying (for the users that would like to find all DS and similar, for example), I use them, as they are the real name of the car... |
2006-12-18 22:53 | ||
| antp | As I said, I see the ordering by year maybe more useful than the ordering by body type. Though that the fist one can be changed in the drop-down box at the top right corner of the list. Maybe I could simply add a similar option to sort by body type? (when I will have some time I will make an option so everybody can chose what sorting style he prefers by default) |
2006-12-18 22:50 | ||
| sixcyl | Thank's Wickey... the Roadster name for body seems to have been used though official name should be Open Two Seater?... Ok. let it be You suggest not to indicate the body type in name field, but rather in extra-info field... I would be 100% ok for this if "extra-info" field could help to put order in the lists... what it doesn't at the moment, due to the fact this field can be entered by many infos from different kind  |
2006-12-18 21:09 | ||
wickey  | wickey: "Hello fellow Jag enthusiasts. I am one of the admins at Internet Movie Cars Database (www.imcdb.org) and we are solving one little problem with denomination of E-Types, XK-Es. On our site, we are trying to identify and correctly name all visible cars in the movies and E-Type is very common there too smiling smiley Anyway to the point. We have E-Types and XK-Es arranged by years and series but we are trying to solve whether the body type denomination (Coupe, Roadster, 2+2) is the part of its model name, or not. We also have a field called Extra Info, where we usually add infos about engine; body style by 30s, 40s US cars; coachbuilders by RR and Bentley etc. What do you think? Should be the model name as this: ''E-Type Roadster'' or just ''E-Type'' and Roadster in extra info field? Or should we use just E-Type without anything, as all the cars are divided to categories by body style generally (Sedan, coupe etc..) here is the recent example with discussion to it: /vehicle.php?id=74257 Please if you have time, take a look and help us out winking smiley For whole IMCDB staff " Robert Moore: "In reply to a message from wickey sent Mon 18 Dec 2006: E-Type or XKE (the name Jaguar chose to market the car in the USA) is correct. Era factory literature did not define the styles as separate models per se, but simply referred to the cars according to their body types; Coupe, 2+2 and OTS. Note that the correct factory nomenclature for the open car is OTS, or open two seater, not roadster. Bob" George Cohn: "The Coupe was usually called a FHC for "Fixed head coupe". So the 3 styles are FHC for the Coupe, 2+2 for the 4 seater model, and OTS (Open Two Seater) for the open model with the cloth or vinyl top. The cars from 1961 to 1964 had a 3.8 litre 6 cylinder engine. The '65 to '71 cars had a 4.2 litre 6 cylinder engine, and the '71 - 74 cars had the 5.3 litre V-12 engine. Most Americans called them XK-E's although the official name was just e-type. The literature in the US often carried the XK-E name although the factory still called them the e-type as well. George Cohn '70 OTS" paul spurlock: "Wickey, This could spin out of control as even Jaguar themselves were not 100% committed to the names and US marketing put their spin on it. Earlier XK open cars were called DHCs (Drop Head Coupes) and that name will be found in some early E-type documentation. In North America marketing had a firm grip on nomenclature for the car so it was called the XKE, tho that name was never adopted by Coventry it is pervasive here and was used in publications and factory ads. Indeed S3 cars are not XKEs by definition as they don't have the XK motor. Roadster would have been used as well, tho I don't think by the factory, but there's even argument as to what a real roadster is. Some say if it doesn't have side curtains its not a roadster. And of course modern mfgs want to call some 4dr sedans "sports cars". In '90 Nissan added a decal in the rear door window "4DSC" which stood for 4dr Sports Car. Short story there's going to be arguments but I don't believe the body style is part of the name. IMHO (only) the priority and probably most correct naming convention would be: 1) E-type, it stands alone, loose XKE if you can, they're all E-types first and foremost but not all XKEs. The following two items being descriptors of 1) could be combined in a separate field but they're independently important. 2) Series; S1, S2 or S3 3) OTS (open two seater), FHC (fixed head coupe) and 2+2. There's little argument in the last two body style names that I know of. E.g.; E-type, S2 FHC or E-type, S3 2+2 etc. pauls 67ots" |
2006-12-18 20:46 | ||
| sixcyl | ... in that case, you find better to have all the E-type Coupé and Roadster mixed togother ...![[Image: nul2.gif]](http://maxfsl.perso.cegetel.net/nul2.gif "http://maxfsl.perso.cegetel.net/nul2.gif") So what? if there are grouped in the same classes?... for ex. all the Citroen ID19, ID20,..are togother, and all the DS are togother in another group... what's the matter? and in the DS group, it's better to have all the "DS21"(berline)togother, and all the "DS21 Cabriolet" togother to respect name designation and order in lists I agree , that is an exception which can help, because you give a link with chassis/internal code .gif ":)") |
2006-12-18 20:43 | ||
| antp | On the other hand, the commercial name is not always the best choice either. Sometimes these name vary from one year to another, and are not easy for classification. For example for Mercedes & BMW the "internal" name is more useful than the commercial one for some uses (searches, classification, etc.) |
2006-12-18 20:18 | ||
| sixcyl | Could you make copy/past of the messages with IMCDB please?... |
2006-12-18 20:02 | ||
| sixcyl | Well, my example is maybe not so good, what I ment is that datas in those registrations documents or certificates are notwhat are used for commercial names ... (here the type is MG1804FA158 MGZ-T ) |
2006-12-18 19:58 | ||
| wickey | well I have some answers: Link to "forums.jag-lovers.org" I think, we should make it according to the 3rd message. |
2006-12-18 18:06 | ||
| wickey | exactly, then model name is quite clear - MG ZT-T |
2006-12-18 13:40 | ||
| sixcyl | thank's... according to what is done here , sales documents, brochures are the vector for this database...not the registration cards or certificates! for instance, my MG ZT-T is described as: Marque MG Type MMG1804FA158 MG ZT-T N°Serie SARRJXTFT3D279102 Carrosserie: BREAK Energie: ES Puissance 13CV Places Assises 005 and as you know the name of this car is MG ZT-T, and not MG ZT-T Break |
2006-12-18 12:58 | ||
| wickey | the question then is, which opinion is more reliable to us - the sales documents, brochures, or certificate..  Anyway I do not wanna argue about that  - I will try to find some E-Type related forum and ask people there |
2006-12-18 11:03 | ||
| sixcyl | Sorry Wickey, but your document is not the commercial document (catalogue) but a purchase certificate / Registration card ... Roadster is the commercial designation of the cabriolet ,eventhough its coded OTS on this certificate... here an example of catalogue were it is clearly mentionned "Roadster" ![[Image: 9f1bss8.2634.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/0is183/9f1bss8.2634.jpg) there are many litterature were these terms of Roadster and Coupé are used |
2006-12-18 01:28 | ||
| wickey | My vision - stay as it was, without anything. If something, then OTS, FHC and 2+2 to Extra info (but I am affraid it will be a bit difficult to say whether FHC or 2+2 by most of the coupes ) |
2006-12-17 23:14 | ||
| Bebert | J'en ai bien peur...  |
2006-12-17 23:11 | ||
| antp | So what, I remove "Roadster" and "Coupe"?  |
2006-12-17 23:00 | ||
| wickey | Well if we look at this... http://www.jaguar-e-type.net/etype_875676_JDHT.jpg It stated the model name quite clearly.. Anyway we should add OTS (Open Two Seater), FHC (Fixed Head Coupe) and 2+2 to the extra info field, but not to the model name. |
2006-12-17 22:55 | ||
| wickey | ![[Image: etype_4-2_bootlid_badge.JPG]](http://www.jungbeker.nl/etype/etype_4-2_bootlid_badge.JPG "http://www.jungbeker.nl/etype/etype_4-2_bootlid_badge.JPG"){kind=icon} |
2006-12-17 22:51 | ||
| garco | I think this link will help. GP5 Artois? http://passioncamionstp.frbb.net/ftopic362.BENOTO.htm |
2006-12-17 21:53 | ||
| Bebert | Oui bien sur! |
2006-12-17 18:45 | ||
| antp | Tu veux dire sur le site ? Aucune ne l'avait, mais je ne sais pas qui a viré l'info. De toute façon en deux lignes de code j'ai remis les Roadstar & Coupe pour toutes les Type E, et je peux les virer ou les mettre en extra info aussi facilement s'il le faut |
2006-12-17 18:42 | ||
| Bebert | Ça me rappelle un débat avec une Simca 9... Comme la majorité des Type-E n'a pas "roaster" dans la dénomination, plions-nous, momentanément à cette majorité. En attendant que sixcyl apporte la preuve de ce qu'il avance... Sur le fond, personnellement, je m'en contrefiche. |
2006-12-17 18:41 | ||
| antp | Where is it written "E-Type"? Link to "www.autowallpaper.de" (well, maybe on some it is written, I do not know) |
2006-12-17 17:55 |
Werbung
