Werbung Zuletzt erstellte Filmseiten
Kommentare über diesen Film| Verknüpfte Seite | Autor | Mitteilung | Datum | Aktion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JenkinsJinkies  | 2001-2005 pre-facelift grille | 2021-04-29 19:11 | ||
rjluna2  | Also, rtsbusman1997, these administrators do their volunteer work here and they have lives going on other than going on IMCDb all the time. Of course ![[:rolleyes]](https://imcdb.opencommunity.be/images/smileys/rolleyes.gif "[:rolleyes]") I also have life as well. I have things that I have book marked throughout the site and when I have chance to confirm something, I update the information on the page. I am just a frequent contributor on this site .gif ":)") Of course, there are some pages that I already confirm them, but these administrators haven't updated the page for ages. I'll just wait until someone else comes by and would pester you guys  -- Last edit: 2011-09-02 20:28:23 |
2011-09-02 13:58 | ||
| tonkatracker | I understand that you are just trying to help and contribute to the site and it is appreciated. The problem is that when you say something that you are not 100% sure of you should use terms like "I think" or "it appears to be" instead of stating it as fact. If you state too many things as fact and then are found out to be wrong on a regular basis it makes admins weary of renaming vehicles based on your identifications. I am not talking about mistakes, everyone makes mistakes (I know I have made plenty) and one of the objectives of this site is to learn. I would just suggest, if you are not sure, make it know in your comment that it is an educated guess (and i know part of it is having sub-par research materials like wikipedia, which is well-known for having mistakes.) As for the admins checking the new posts, there are a lot of admins and I know the first thing I do (as well as some of the other admins) is check all comments made since I was on the site last, so your comments will be seen. In the event that a comment is missed for some period of time (which is bound to happen once in a while) then feel free to bring it to our attention, but just give us time. | 2011-09-02 05:18 | ||
| rtsbusman1997 | I don't do it to be a impatient dick. I do it so the admins know that I gave a answer that needs to be researched. I know that they have a tough job and they might be busy and may not notice anything I have put down. If it was such a extreme hindrance, you could have just told me not to do it instead of waiting to tell me. I won't do it anymore if it is so bothersome, then. FYI, I may not be right all of the time (who is?),but I do research on EVERYTHING I put down. I just don't link everything I write down. I don't even TRY to claim to be right all the time. I just try to help and contribute. |
2011-09-02 04:05 | ||
chicomarx  | 2011-09-01 05:42 | |||
| tonkatracker | Seriously stop with the "Ahem"s already. The admins on this site do it voluntarily so give us some time to get to it. Your changes are also not made right away because one of the sdmins has to research it because you offer no proof as to what you are saying and you are not always 100% correct. | 2011-09-01 05:17 | ||
| rtsbusman1997 | 1995-2002. | 2011-08-31 02:22 | ||
| Neptune | At least a 1996 model. | 2007-01-11 03:48 | ||
appassionato  | 2000 S3 ! | 2006-05-15 19:29 | ||
DIEHARD  | Ph2 | 2006-03-19 20:08 | ||
| DIEHARD | Ph2 and it is an Activa, visible from the wheels... | 2006-03-16 20:03 | ||
Bebert  | Alors si c'est la règle...OK | 2005-11-01 13:10 | ||
| sixcyl | Certes mais la régle dans ce cas est de proposer la première année millesime. | 2005-11-01 12:11 | ||
| Bebert | Pourquoi l'avoir datée de 1967 ? Elle peut être de 68 ou 69. | 2005-11-01 11:52 | ||
| sixcyl | La MkIII est produite de 1967 à 1970, et se reconnait par son pare-choc avant surélevé. Les roues à rayons ne sont pas de série. | 2005-10-30 10:51 | ||
| Bebert | Certes, mais beaucoup de Spit ont été "bidouillées" et pas toujours dans le respect de "l'origine" ! | 2005-10-01 12:15 | ||
| thomas | J'ai vu ce film en 01/05 à la télé. Phares jaunes ? Joncs de capots non chromés ? Bizarre, non ? | 2005-09-29 21:49 | ||
| Bebert | MkIII d'avant 1970 | 2005-06-22 07:16 | ||
| TaTa | A, c'est vrai, c'est l'ancien modèle | 2005-02-05 17:37 | ||
| antp | La nouvelle version oui, mais là il me semble que c'est l'ancienne version. | 2005-01-11 10:37 | ||
| antp | Non c'est bien une Espace. Par contre celui qui succède la 306 est un Land Rover  |
2005-01-11 10:36 | ||
| tata | Non, le véhicule qui précède la 306 est un Land Rover Range Rover P38 | 2005-01-11 01:59 | ||
| tata | Est-ce-qu'en France cette voiture porte le nom de Tiburon | 2005-01-11 01:57 | ||
| antp | Je les confonds toujours |
2004-10-22 20:07 | ||
| chamal | c'est une BMW série 3 E36 | 2004-10-08 20:23 | ||
| chamal | c'est pas une safrane sur la photo mais une laguna voila +++ |
2004-10-08 20:23 | ||
| goku | parfaitement une superbe S3 evo ! | 2004-09-22 17:13 | ||
| Mav | C'est pas une A3, mais une S3 | 2004-09-22 16:10 | ||
| naz | c'est pas un Evasion, c'est un C8 !!! | 2004-08-10 13:45 | ||
| antp | 0h31'07" Voiture du père de la mariée |
2004-07-30 10:22 | ||
| antp | 0h39'52" précède la 306 rouge |
2004-07-30 10:21 | ||
| antp | 0h39'58" Suit la BMW blanche |
2004-07-30 10:21 | ||
| antp | 0h55'25" Taxi qu'on ne voit que dans cette scène-là |
2004-07-30 10:19 | ||
| antp | 0h12'23" Voiture du marié |
2004-07-30 10:19 |
Ergebnisseiten Werbung
