Advertising
Comments about this movie - Page 1/2 [ Next ] | Related page | Author | Message | Date | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Gamer ![]() | This one seems to have been leftover stock that was sold: V 230 built April 1, 1998 in Charcoal Black Metallic but not delivered until November 26, 1999! Maybe it has something to do with this? VSA63823413125215 -- Last edit: 2020-03-19 21:08:52 |
2020-03-19 21:07 | ||
Gamer ![]() | 1998 Vito by plate (B525EO177) but it's a V-Class. | 2020-03-17 13:55 | ||
Gamer ![]() | 1998 confirmed by plate (Y797OH177) | 2020-03-17 13:53 | ||
Gamer ![]() | 1999 by plate (P610XY90) -- Last edit: 2020-03-17 13:27:27 |
2020-03-17 13:26 | ||
dhill_cb7 ![]() | Autocheck: 2007 Chevrolet Express 1500 VIN: 1GBFH15TX71129819 Style / Body: Cargo Van 3DEngine: 5.3L V8 SFI Country of Assembly: United States |
2020-03-13 10:43 | ||
Gamer ![]() | 1GBFH15TX71129819 for dhill. Here's what it looks like now: Link to "images.weserv.nl" Link to "images.weserv.nl" |
2020-03-13 10:36 | ||
Gamer ![]() | 2000 by plate (E696OX177) | 2017-11-22 16:46 | ||
slon95 ![]() | S320 by plate. | 2017-01-22 18:04 | ||
slon95 ![]() | 745LI by plate. | 2017-01-22 17:57 | ||
slon95 ![]() | 2007 Chevrolet Express G 1500 by plate. | 2017-01-22 17:49 | ||
slon95 ![]() | 1997+ | 2016-08-26 00:49 | ||
Gamer ![]() | 2006 by plate. | 2016-06-29 21:22 | ||
Robi ![]() | 2003+ facelift model | 2016-04-18 10:29 | ||
Gamer ![]() | According to the plate, it is a 2003 "ABS69360A SH" | 2016-01-29 18:13 | ||
cibup ![]() | Not built in Austria, that's US spec. | 2012-03-08 21:23 | ||
cibup ![]() | Built in Austria for Europe | 2011-01-25 01:14 | ||
love krittaya ![]() | Foton Ollin | 2010-09-21 07:21 | ||
potter ![]() | But if you simply have bad words! And here is speculative. Be corrected. I do not care that much time. Because I think they expect the site to be accurate. And do not look the fool who is right! |
2010-09-20 16:17 | ||
dsl ![]() | Seems the Rover was exported to France at least: "MY FIRST ROVER BACK IN FRANCE WAS A 213 SE AUTO, 1986, WITH THE "SMALL" BOOT(LID) IT WAS A VERY GOOD CAR, ALTHOUGH QUITE SMALL INSIDE COMPARED TO THE MAESTRO I GOT LOANED DURING SERVICING FROM GARAGE DU LION FORT IN ORLEANS BUT THAT 1.3/A(+?) ENGINE AND CHEAP INTERIOR WERE A LET DOWN. AS FOR THE 2ND ONE, IT WAS THE 216 EFI VDP SAME PRICE AS A BMW316, BUT I DIDN'T HAVE TO FORK OUT EXTRA FOR PAS, EL/WINDOWS, CENTRAL LOCKING AND THAT LEATHER & WOOD AMBIENCE. BACK THEN, ROVER, IN FRANCE WAS ON A PAR WITH VOLVO AND BMW IN THAT UP-MARKET NICHE... THEN THEY WERE STILL PUTING THEM IN THE SAME SHOWROOM AS THE M CARS FROM AUSTIN AND YES THEY WERE LOOKING MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THEIR PRICE TAG, AND MAYBE THEY COULD HAVE BEEN TRIUMPH AS WELL, ESPECIALLY THE EFI VERSIONS, LOTS OF GRUNT IN THEM, LIKE THE RANGE TOPPER DOLOMITE." [http://aronline.co.uk/index.htm?ausindexf.htm , final comment on page in capitals as here!] -- Last edit: 2010-09-20 13:03:53 |
2010-09-20 12:57 | ||
dsl ![]() | ....only if produced in LHD. We've only 2 Honda Ballades on the whole site - one of which in a HK film is RHD /vehicle_104020-Honda-Ballade-1984.html - could this have been made in UK? |
2010-09-20 12:43 | ||
Gag Halfrunt ![]() | No, there was a UK-built version of the Ballade, which was presumably exported to other European markets: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rover_200#Mark_I_.281984-1989.29 |
2010-09-20 12:24 | ||
dsl ![]() | Did the Rover 213 [SD3] tie-up mean Honda were not allowed to sell this Civic in Europe? | 2010-09-20 12:07 | ||
antp ![]() | Maybe southern (Spain) or western europe then? As there they usually like sedans, hence the Renault Clio sedan which did not exist in France/Belgium/Germany | 2010-09-20 11:55 | ||
tonkaTRACKER ![]() | the sad thing is that I knew Ballade was Japan (well atleast I knew that the CR-X was Ballade in Japan) but wiki said the sedan was sold in Europe as the Ballade and once again I listened when I shouldn't have ![]() |
2010-09-20 03:19 | ||
antp ![]() | Ballade was in Japan indeed. I do not remember having ever seen the sedan version in Belgium, just the hatchback, so I guess it was not sold in EU. |
2010-09-20 00:28 | ||
ingo ![]() | No, the name Ballade ws not used in Germany. Maybe I should think about Gag's comment, that this is a Japan-version here. The Europe-version had the plate between the back lamps, so it looks different. Otherwise in Germany smaller Sedan's were always very unpopular (except 1990+ in the former DDR). Here the Hatchback-versions (of all kind of small and semi-small cars of every brand) were always preferred. See the actual offers of 1980-1990 Civic's: Link to "suchen.mobile.de" Oops, I have to correct myself: I mixed up Honda and Mitsubishi. I drove once the "Civic Shuttle". |
2010-09-20 00:21 | ||
tonkaTRACKER ![]() | I was referring to rjluna's comment as he seemed confused. @ ingo you may know these sedan versions as Honda Ballade, (I believe that is what they were called in EU) -- Last edit: 2010-09-20 00:03:26 |
2010-09-20 00:01 | ||
ingo ![]() | My problem is, that I cannot remember, that I've ever seen this Sedan-version here. The others for sure, the Space Wagon-version I've even driven by myself. | 2010-09-19 23:58 | ||
Gag Halfrunt ![]() | It's a used import from Japan - right hand drive and with the number plate sitting awkwardly on the bumper. -- Last edit: 2010-09-19 23:58:57 |
2010-09-19 23:58 | ||
tonkaTRACKER ![]() | whats the problem? it is a 84-85 Civic Sedan and labeled as such -- Last edit: 2010-09-19 23:51:01 |
2010-09-19 23:49 | ||
ingo ![]() | Hmmm, this Civic-generation was sold on our market, but I cannot remember, that I've ever seen this Sedan-back. | 2010-09-19 23:48 | ||
rjluna2 ![]() | I thought this is 3rd generation Honda Civic ![]() http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1984-1987_Honda_Civic_sedan_01.jpg |
2010-09-19 23:45 | ||
dsl ![]() | Not intended - if I'd realised this was already underway elsewhere, I would have left it alone. | 2010-09-19 23:31 | ||
antp ![]() | Please do not start discussions on multiple pages /vehicle.php?id=165996 |
2010-09-19 22:48 | ||
potter ![]() | At least now embark on a well-written. DSL and you look at it!: Http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Mondeo the compiler of the "friend"! |
2010-09-19 18:42 | ||
Sandie ![]() | We've had this argument a lot the past few days. |
2010-09-19 15:50 | ||
dsl ![]() | If you look at all the Mondeos already on the site, we seem to have far too many under the sequence: 1993+ Mk1 1997+ Mk2 2001+ Mk3 2007+ Mk4 for it to be worth changing. The Mk1-4 sequence is not wrong or misleading so why not keep it? Changing everything to Mk1-3 would be very time consuming; while it may be slightly more accurate as some people argue, it doesn't really give a useful improvement. |
2010-09-19 15:14 | ||
potter ![]() | Yes it is a Mondeo MK2. Why? The first 93-Mondeo debut in this 96-in thoroughly updated (many believe this is the MK2 is not), it is manufactured until 2000. In 2000 he came out of the "New Edge", this Mondeo MK2 it in production until 2007. The MK3 is in 2007. This is now being updated. -- Last edit: 2010-09-19 14:59:18 |
2010-09-19 14:54 | ||
130rapid ![]() | RHD car, definitely imported from Japan. | 2010-09-19 14:18 | ||
130rapid ![]() | With this bumper and side mirror it's rather GAZ-310221 Universal. | 2010-09-19 13:52 | ||
Gag Halfrunt ![]() | If this version was introduced in 1998, then it's made for RUS not SU. | 2010-09-19 12:42 | ||
electra225 ![]() | Mondeo for me, too. | 2010-09-19 09:48 | ||
Jale ![]() | ![]() ![]() |
2010-09-19 09:42 | ||
Jale ![]() | ![]() |
2010-09-19 09:38 | ||
Jale ![]() | ![]() |
2010-09-19 09:21 | ||
Jale ![]() | ![]() |
2010-09-19 09:10 | ||
jarama ![]() | Nissan Avenir http://www.autowp.ru/picture/309737 | 2010-09-19 08:43 | ||
jarama ![]() | Yes ,istana | 2010-09-19 08:39 | ||
jarama ![]() | The bumper reminds it http://www.autowp.ru/picture/317792 | 2010-09-19 08:37 | ||
jarama ![]() | Toyota Mark II Qualis Link to "www.drive2.ru" | 2010-09-19 08:34 |
Advertising