[ Login ]

Advertising

Last completed movie pages

The Siege at Ruby Ridge; Stand-In; Big Meat Eater; Funny Bones; The Bamboo Prison; Špadijer - jedan život; La nuit du carrefour; Power Book IV: Force; Ah dai; Acorralada; Bullets or Ballots; Hasta que la boda nos separe; Kissin' Cousins; Doctor X; The Inspector; (more...)

Comments about this movie - Page 1/6 [ Next ]

Related pageAuthorMessageDateActions
Kagamihara Nadeshiko JP2002+ 2022-06-06 01:26
carenthusiast08 SXThis brings back memories! I watched the DVD at my grandmother's house, and I actually forgot it existed until now! This brings a tear to my eye. 2021-06-12 23:54
m.pfaffeneder DE2.0 TDCi as it has 1997cc 2012-09-30 16:49
dsl SX1995 Bugatti EB110 GT
Registration no: 30 DCD
Chassis no: ZA9AB01GORCD39053
http://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/showthread.php?t=54852 .
/vehicle.php?id=71792 .
2012-05-26 03:27
movie star ATBasically this is a nice-looking car. Rovers are not known for reliability but still it does at least look nice. 2011-06-21 22:25
93monteroThe site moviewatch.in has a somewhat efficient chat box that any member can use that remains to the right of every page on the site. It can also be hidden from view in the settings. 2011-02-15 05:59
ford_guy USAnother thing to keep in mind ;) 2011-02-08 17:06
antp BEAnd do not forget: if you fill the database faster than I improve the site to handle the high volume of data that it reaches, we'll head to problems :p 2011-02-07 23:16
ford_guy USingo: I get what you mean and I am guilty of the occasional off-topic discussion (such as now). I was just agreeing with antp's and Neptune's idea that some type of chat box or IM would be nice so that these discussions, which are often times irrelevant after a while, don't clutter up the individual pages. 2011-02-07 21:54
Nightrider RU
chicomarx wrote There's lots of off-topic discussions about off-topic discussions now.



No, I've seen longer "CLARKSON MUST DIE" threads than this.


I don't think that Clarkson must die. I just realize fact, that he is..."see above".
2011-02-07 21:28
chicomarx BEThere's lots of off-topic discussions about off-topic discussions now.

Mudflap wrote Could this be the most comments ever posted on a page? It must be close...


No, I've seen longer "CLARKSON MUST DIE" threads than this.
2011-02-07 20:04
dsl SX
ingo wrote the influence of the *cough* local weather.

Can't be the weather - SG is a Scottish issue (Edinburgh). Road salt.
2011-02-07 19:57
dsl SX
ingo wrote But the forum is only used by some single members and often nothing happens for a longer time. And the discussion was caused directly by a reaction of an IMCDB-member about a specific, here listed series.

I agree with ingo - going off-piste only really works on the main database - it's spontaneous and fun, makes it interesting to see where some of the exchanges go. Gradually some of the characters become interesting people from the snapshots which emerge. I do at the same time realise that some of the meanderings will read as total gibberish to other contributors so try not to go bananas too often - the point about the car itself sometimes getting buried under a discussion on Marmite, mixer taps or whatever is well made.

One thing I am happier to accept is some discussions being deleted afterwards - they can have very temporary importance, accuracy, rants or whatever which quickly go stale or are irrelevant. Losing these would have little effect, but where there is exchanges of info or real opinion these should stay. If imcdb is a community we should trust each other - if the admins are prepared to allow some off-piste stuff without slapping me down too hard, I am happy to trust their judgement in quietly deleting some of my stuff afterwards when it's passed its sell-by date and become irrelevant. For example I put up a comment the other day about Marmite chocolate to complete a topic mentioned some months ago - it was aimed at 2 contributors, and once they've read it it has served my purpose. If it gets deleted tomorrow - fine by me, or it can stay in case anyone else stumbles over it in the future and is interested - so be it.
2011-02-07 19:54
ingo DEOne guy in our local garage is busy with wrecking it. It stucked completely dismantled on a forklift. The reason for scrapping was the rust. Even the zinc-coating couldn't avoid the influence of the *cough* local weather. 2011-02-07 19:30
dsl SX
ingo wrote One hour ago I've seen something for our DVLA-checkers: F 486 USG ;)

With a bit of merging - Porsche 944 Lux 2.7, Date of Liability 01 11 2010, date of First Registration 01 01 1989. And??
2011-02-07 19:22
ingo DEBut the forum is only used by some single members and often nothing happens for a longer time. And the discussion was caused directly by a reaction of an IMCDB-member about a specific, here listed series.

The suggestion, Neptune is mentioning, is not new, it came a time ago, that a function of personal messages would be recommended.

Now a bit back in direction on-topic. One hour ago I've seen something for our DVLA-checkers: F 486 USG ;)
2011-02-07 19:12
ford_guy USI agree. Usually I don't mind the long-winded conversations as long as they stay somewhat relevant to the page they are on. But when they go so off-topic, it looks bad and can be annoying for those who are actually looking for information pertinent to a vehicle/movie. 2011-02-07 02:35
Neptune USIt’s sad to see the site being used as an instant messenger, even though G-MANN is correct, it is convenient by nature.

I do use an instant messenger program (windows live messenger) as I am online quite frequently. Perhaps it would be best to try and lead users into using some type of IM (perhaps setting up a group) until a dedicated messaging utility of some kind is made for the site. I know the site has been moved allowing it more resources, but doesn’t mean it should be abused.
2011-02-07 01:40
G-MANN UK
antp wrote There is the forum for discussions


I think people find the forum more constrictive and not as easy to use as the main site. Here you can just click "See all comments" and see what's been posted very quickly. And also somehow it's easier to start random discussions about things here (someone sees a picture of with something in it and that makes them start talking about something)
2011-02-06 22:27
ingo DEThis specific, now deleted discussion didn't include mayonnaise, it was in a direct context to the said "show" and it's maker :p carobserver was in rage about that. 2011-02-05 17:40
antp BE
ingo wrote :mad: Why are the comments and the discussion, caused by carobserver's rage there: /movie_446299-Clarkson-s-Top-100-Cars.html deleted :??: This comes close to censorship and I'm not really amused, to write comments for the garbage-box :/

I saw a bunch of off-topic stuff about comes which were already deleted (by Carobserver, I guess), it seemed useless to me :p
For that I plan to add a shoutbox, i.e. a kind of chat with short-term storage (as for that it is useless to keep that on long term).
Stop using the comments like a chat and comments won't be deleted :p There is the forum for discussions
If you find DVLA info less useful than chatting about mayonnaise and travel, maybe you misunderstood the purpose of the comments on the site :p

-- Last edit: 2011-02-05 17:34:50
2011-02-05 17:23
antp BE
ingo wrote
So it's still my opinion, that especially the work of TheHeartbreakKid15 is just cluttering up the database.

It is useful to have some DVLA info, IMHO.
What is cluttering the pages is lines like this:
CO2 Emissions Not Available
Vehicle Type Approval null
which are really useless :D (and some of the others, depending on the car)
2011-02-05 17:01
ingo DE
G-MANN wrote PS. I don't know what you mean here:

The most cars, shown in this "show", are new models, often brand new company-owned demonstration- or test-drive-models. Their DVLA-datas are really uninteresting and not helpful. Yes, it is the newest version and yes, it's surely still on the road. And Clarkson or his henchmen will surely tell some detail-informations about them.
Due all that, DVLA is senseless for all these new cars.

-- Last edit: 2011-02-04 22:59:52
2011-02-04 22:58
G-MANN UKAlso, since people have begun to complain about DVLA info wasting space, I've started deleting lines where it says "not applicable" or "export marker not used". 2011-02-04 21:58
dsl SXIf I check DVLA or other similar I always post it - saves anyone else having to do it. Where we don't have the details, the assumption is no-one's looked. So I say put it in - even if the results are predictable - so the box is ticked and we have the full info presented. 2011-02-04 21:47
G-MANN UKPS. I don't know what you mean here:

ingo wrote When a new model/version is released, as usual there (if not cars, which were trashed)? Absolutely useless, because the clow... -err, the fans- who are watching this "show", will hear it by the comments and are able to list the car correctly.


But maybe we should just agree to disagree and leave this little discussion.

-- Last edit: 2011-02-04 21:42:09
2011-02-04 21:41
G-MANN UK
Sandie wrote Also most of the time the uploader or an admin will run a check and add trim and engine details themselves without posting a comment.


I know and I used to do that, but now I think it's better to show some evidence. People like rcpm just write "DVLA checked" or "hpi checked" which is fine but I choose to copy and paste the site text. That's my choice (and it doesn't really take up much space :p )

-- Last edit: 2011-02-04 21:35:53
2011-02-04 21:32
Sandie SXIt's useful in some older cars (10, 15 years +) to find out if they are still on the road. However, for new cars in TV series it is not as helpful as the cars will generally be pretty much always still on the road.

Also most of the time the uploader or an admin will run a check and add trim and engine details themselves without posting a comment.

2011-02-04 21:29
G-MANN UKWell Ingo, I still like to have the DVLA info listed, that's all I can say.

ingo wrote especially the work of TheHeartbreakKid15 is just cluttering up the database.


Not really. It might only be irritating to some when they click "See all comments" and find a load of blocks of DVLA info.


-- Last edit: 2011-02-04 21:30:40
2011-02-04 21:29
ingo DE
G-MANN wrote That stuff doesn't really take up that much space per vehicle and it's helpful to determine the year and engine size of a car.


When a new model/version is released, as usual there (if not cars, which were trashed)? Absolutely useless, because the clow... -err, the fans- who are watching this "show", will hear it by the comments and are able to list the car correctly. That's enough. This DVLA-check makes only sense, when we cannot identify a car exactly, or when we have the remarkable situation, that a car, appearing in an older movie/show/series is indeed still existing.
So it's still my opinion, that especially the work of TheHeartbreakKid15 is just cluttering up the database.
2011-02-04 21:22
G-MANN UKI'm not bothered, myself. I still remember what we said to each other and let's be honest, why were we having that chat? To kill time, we had nothing better to do. (I'm not saying that talking to you is a waste of time, btw ;) ) It was a throwaway discussion but was a bit off-topic. I couldn't have seen myself revisting that discussion (believe or not, sometimes I have looked back at some old comments from people)

ingo wrote This comes close to censorship


Meh, so what? :D

ingo wrote it was more on-topic than this bugging cluttering up the database with the DVLA-datas of all the cars, appearing in te Clarklson-"show".


That stuff doesn't really take up that much space per vehicle and it's helpful to determine the year and engine size of a car. What is a waste of space is people quoting entire comments when adding a comment immediately below :p
2011-02-04 21:07
ingo DE:mad: Why are the comments and the discussion, caused by carobserver's rage there: /movie_446299-Clarkson-s-Top-100-Cars.html deleted :??: This comes close to censorship and I'm not really amused, to write comments for the garbage-box :/
Though carobserver was going too far with his choice of words, it's no reason to delete all comments of the others. :mad:
And the argument, that it was off-toppic, doesn't fit - it was more on-topic than this bugging cluttering up the database with the DVLA-datas of all the cars, appearing in te Clarklson-"show".
2011-02-04 12:39
Nightrider RU
130rapid wrote

Hundreds Youtube movies with suckers just silly demolishing or racing-to-dead retired cars or seizing old engines confirm that.


But that videos not broadcasted around the world and nobody care about that suckers.
2011-02-03 16:04
rjluna2 USDon't forget our government's method of destroying engine for cash for clunker program :mad: 2011-02-03 15:01
130rapid PL
Nightrider wrote Back to Jeremy, I think that a lot of people thinks that he's very cool as he can bash any cars he want without any pity.


Hundreds Youtube movies with suckers just silly demolishing or racing-to-dead retired cars or seizing old engines confirm that.
2011-02-03 14:56
Nightrider RU
G-MANN wrote

When you say "bash" do you mean as in "wreck" or "criticize"?


Both of them. )
2011-02-03 14:23
G-MANN UK
Nightrider wrote he can bash any cars he want without any pity.


When you say "bash" do you mean as in "wreck" or "criticize"?
2011-02-03 12:10
ingo DE
Nightrider wrote Back to Jeremy, I think that a lot of people thinks that he's very cool as he can bash any cars he want without any pity.


Exactly this thinking makes it worth to condemn these people. All little uneducated low-class-wankers.
2011-02-03 10:53
Nightrider RUBack to Jeremy, I think that a lot of people thinks that he's very cool as he can bash any cars he want without any pity. 2011-02-03 09:37
ingo DEFor a while jokes about Polish were common, also it was a kind of ritual of a German show/talkmaster to have always one new in every show. But it's ebbed away, since it got too constrained and boring. In Southern Germany there are pejorative jokes about the Austrians, but there in the North we don't know them. 2011-02-03 01:55
ingo DE
G-MANN wrote so much I don't tend to get very offended when people mock the British, I don't take it personally because it's a very generalised insult (we're not perfect either). Anti-British remarks usually don't bother me.


In Germany there aren't too many Anti-British remarks/prejudices/jokes common. Not as some British newspapers are doing before some football-matches about Germany. And even that don't really annoy us. It's seen more as folklore. And also as a kind of respect, even a little inferiority-complex, as I just read in a "manual for better understanding" England and the English ( Link to "www.christoph-links-verlag.de" ) :)
Informative series, I also have the books about USA, Poland and Holland.



-- Last edit: 2011-02-03 01:51:01
2011-02-03 01:49
G-MANN UKWhat I meant was "except in German". What you wrote would have been the English translation of what you said. 2011-02-03 01:48
ingo DE
G-MANN wrote
Did you really say that to your in-laws (albiet in German)? I hope you already have a very good relationship with them and they're cool enough not to mind about such a comment because that sounds pretty rude.


"albiets" :??: Sorry, this term is unknown.

Sometimes clear words are helpful ;) It's not the only subject area, the others know, that I easily can go through the roof.
2011-02-03 01:42
G-MANN UK
ingo wrote @G-Mann: this has nothing to do with the fact, that it's a British guy and a British made concotion ;)


Don't worry, I can think of other popular things (X-Factor, The Jeremy Kyle Show) that make the British public look dumb for watching so much I don't tend to get very offended when people mock the British, I don't take it personally because it's a very generalised insult (we're not perfect either). Anti-British remarks usually don't bother me.

-- Last edit: 2011-02-03 00:54:38
2011-02-03 00:46
G-MANN UK
ingo wrote So it happend just last Saturday, at the dinner with my wife's family. I dislike, to talk about TV-programmes while eating, resp. in the family or between colleagues at all. My wife was really pissed (but I ignored that willingly), when I was successful with cutting the boring conversation about some stupid private-TV-shit with "What a poor and boring life you all must have, when you have the need to watch this incredible debile shit, made for debile spastics, and -much worse- even have the need to talk about that! It's so annoying, that I would like to go home now."


Did you really say that to your in-laws (albeit in German)? I hope you already have a very good relationship with them and they're cool enough not to mind about such a comment because that sounds pretty rude.


-- Last edit: 2011-02-08 05:08:25
2011-02-03 00:29
Sandie SXConsidering that they have just now pulled the Spider and Brera from the UK market following (I guess) slow sales their endorsement and opinion mattered not a jot to the paying customers.

2011-02-03 00:07
Weasel1984 PLWhich exactly episode it was, unfortunately I will not tell you. It was 5 years ago. :/ Well though can be possible to check on IMCDb TG page...
Edit:
Perhaps this one was when they said it is cool - /vehicle_36855-Alfa-Romeo-Brera-2006.html
I remember in this ep. they had it only at the studio, not sure was it red though, maybe black, but on the site is only a red one...
In the one when he "puked" Alfa was only at the pic - on the screen (with new cars) or on the paper sheet - few eps. earlier.

-- Last edit: 2011-02-03 00:32:06
2011-02-03 00:01
Nightrider RU
Weasel1984 wrote in one episode he told, that Alfa Brera is the ugliest car ever made (he nearly puked) and then, few eps later, he and dwarf were delighted, that Brera is beautiful - and it was not any joke or malice.


Ahhhh...))
Where we can find it? I want to listen it myself.))
2011-02-02 23:58
Weasel1984 PLHe has a personality disorder or... :p Let's be honest, I will never forget, how in one episode he told, that Alfa Brera is the ugliest car ever made (he nearly puked) and then, few eps later, he and dwarf were delighted, that Brera is beautiful - and it was not any joke or malice. Everyone can change opinion, but... Since this time, I do not watch TG.
Well and those "jokes" about Mexicans, no comment...

-- Last edit: 2011-02-03 00:22:22
2011-02-02 23:54
Nightrider RU
ingo wrote

Everyone should have an own opinion - but where the f.ck is the neccessarity to blow around the private opinion about cars (or anything else) of an irrelevant freak? And this for years?


Maybe...because he can? Nobody wants an adequate analysis from him, so...
But I'm interesting, how honest he in his opinions?
2011-02-02 23:09

Results pages [ Next ]

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Advertising