Werbung Zuletzt erstellte Filmseiten
Kommentare über diesen Film - Page 1/2 [ Next ] | Verknüpfte Seite | Autor | Mitteilung | Datum | Aktion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
dhill_cb7  | Unless this one is optioned with RPO 261. Which deletes the V12 emblem. Best to list without power output. |
2023-06-03 02:15 | ||
GodzillaFan54  | This Mercedes handled getting run over by a monster truck pretty well, the roof didn't get crushed in despite those two giant tires rolling right over it. Though I'd imagine it'd still need a little work before being 100% operational again  |
2023-03-16 22:15 | ||
| GodzillaFan54 | I don't believe this accurately represents the car; this listing makes it seem like it's a monster truck for the entire movie when it's really only one for the last five minutes, the rest of the time it's a standard 1920s flatbed truck. | 2023-01-23 20:09 | ||
Z2  | It's a 500SEC as there's no V12 badge visible, seen here:![[Image: vlcsnap-2015-08-29-16h34m54s740.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/27951/vlcsnap-2015-08-29-16h34m54s740.jpg) |
2021-05-16 16:50 | ||
Sandie  | I'd not be surprised if it was the same car twice, both are 1993ish productions filmed in CA. | 2020-08-08 22:22 | ||
Baube  | tried to search a little bit , only thing i found so far is a 1996 that got repainted | 2020-08-08 21:47 | ||
| dhill_cb7 | Did not research. However, knowing car manufacturers both answers seem plausible. | 2020-08-08 21:41 | ||
| Baube | could silver still be available by special order ? or did some late 1992 ones got the logo ? questions.. |
2020-08-08 21:04 | ||
| Z2 | I can't see how this can be a 1993 model since silver was discontinued after 1992. Yet the logo on the front wasn't introduced until '93... very puzzling. Maybe leave the year blank until we can figure this out? Found same exact issue with this one: /vehicle.php?id=994619 -- Last edit: 2020-08-08 20:31:26 |
2020-07-05 18:20 | ||
| rtsbusman1997 | Made for USA | 2020-02-09 14:21 | ||
| dhill_cb7 | 5 lug on the rear wheel negates [G-30]. Front badge is too bulky to read 10. |
2019-07-14 01:19 | ||
| Literate Vigorous | Driven by Tyler, played by Rob Schneider. Tyler is a yuppie and this is a Very unusual choice of car for a yuppie. -- Last edit: 2018-03-13 20:13:54 |
2018-03-13 20:13 | ||
| Baube | just saw this : Escort is not wagon but sedan ( or 5-door hatchback )  |
2016-12-28 03:21 | ||
| Reg1992 | Darn, thought I had a perfect streak going for me there... |
2016-12-28 01:50 | ||
| Baube | red wagon is Escort and the car behind it is an Acura Legend | 2016-12-28 01:46 | ||
| Reg1992 | Ford Taurus wagon behind the truck, and another Taurus (red) next to the Sentra. Looks like a then-new 1994 Honda Accord behind it, and a 1981-83 Toyota Corolla behind the Accord/in front of the Jeep. 1987-89 Toyota Camry going the other way on the right. -- Last edit: 2016-12-28 01:38:44 |
2016-12-28 01:33 | ||
| Reg1992 | A late-80s or early-90s Ford F-150 behind it, I think. Also a 1984-85 Honda Civic hatchback in the next lane. | 2016-12-28 01:31 | ||
| Reg1992 | Also a 1990-93 Chevrolet Lumina behind it on the left. The car behind the Sentra might be a 1982-85 Honda Accord. | 2016-12-28 01:28 | ||
opal  | 1989-93. | 2016-12-24 21:30 | ||
| ryantee82 | The car's alleged price is just a line from the movie but it might help date the car. Mr. Drysdale: So you take this [gestures towards Lincoln Town Car limousine], and I'll follow you in my Rolls-Royce [gestures towards Corniche]. There you go. Jethro: Is that your car? D: Yes it is. J: Ain't that fancy...can I drive it? D: You? Drive my $180,000 Rolls-Royce? J: [nods] D: [nervous pause] ..uhh well of course you can, son, I think that's a great idea! |
2016-09-18 23:57 | ||
| ELEKTR0N | That's definitely a Honda XR100R | 2016-03-16 20:18 | ||
| rtsbusman1997 | As a side note, there was a 1992 Ford Taurus 'Police Package' [55A] missed, as well as some of the times being completely wrong. I'll put the correct times down. | 2015-12-20 05:18 | ||
| GodzillaFan54 | I miss Jim Varney. RIP, Jim. |
2015-12-05 16:11 | ||
| Buc84 | A lot of the 'new' cars you see getting wrecked in movies and such I was told years ago by someone in the know are the cars that can't be sold (Have to be destroyed,most just get crushed?) due to liability issues,stuff like R&D cars,prototypes,cars that were somehow damaged in transit or storage (Like in a flood?)and of course,those infamous "Factory Buyback" cars?(A 'Lemon' they were made to buy back from the buyer.) | 2015-05-23 18:27 | ||
karoomay  | @MisterZ - I figured.  |
2015-05-19 15:42 | ||
| Baube | yeah, seen that way, make sense to me ( but still , they could had placed the Mustang & Taurus somewhere else... .gif ":)") ) |
2015-05-19 08:10 | ||
| rtsbusman1997 | Well, if the producers have connections, it could have been vehicles provided for product placement. Would have absorbed much of the budget. Considering 13 of the 24 cars are brand new (or somewhat new) it wouldn't have been hard to get new cars to crash, since most movies get most of its budgets from the product placement. | 2015-05-19 06:45 | ||
| karoomay | MisterZ, I should have asked about this earlier but I'll ask it now, was there a closer shot of the 1992+ Ford Taurus SHO seen the the left here? /vehicle_28871-Jaguar-XJ6-Series-III-1979.html They were not very common and it was another then new Ford they wrecked for this scene. |
2015-05-18 15:38 | ||
| Baube | assuming that its a base Mustang it was a little less than 13 000 $CDN ( surely less in USD ), not too expensive but i agree with you, getting a brand new Mustang just to destroy it is not the best idea... -- Last edit: 2015-05-18 14:57:36 |
2015-05-18 14:55 | ||
| MisterZ | The budget of this movie was only 25 million, though. Not what I call a big budget film. | 2015-05-18 14:35 | ||
| Baube | because Hollywood has money.... |
2015-05-18 14:02 | ||
| MisterZ | Arghh, why destroy a brand-new Mustang when they could have used an older one in the scene? And why ruin a perfectly good late model S-Class? | 2015-05-18 09:21 | ||
| Baube | 1992-1993 because of coloured bumpers Link to "image.mustangandfords.com" vs Link to "www.allfordmustangs.com" ( applies to LX only ) -- Last edit: 2015-05-18 07:43:10 |
2015-05-18 07:40 | ||
| rtsbusman1997 | 1987+ | 2015-05-17 23:29 | ||
| karoomay | Rear seen here: |
2015-05-17 20:03 | ||
| jettalover | I saw a 500E last week. Those are rare. It will be a long time until I see another. | 2015-05-17 03:14 | ||
jplemoine  | Yam PW 80? | 2015-05-16 19:31 | ||
130rapid  | We don't need it. It's 1991-1993 because fully color-keyed bumper, and 325i indeed (air inlet for oil cooler, in front spoiler). |
2015-05-16 09:58 | ||
| rtsbusman1997 | 1987+ | 2015-05-16 09:57 | ||
| 130rapid | For sure 1980+ Silver Shadow Series II, because twin exhaust pipes, chromed bumpers and side mirrors. 1985 only possible due to reachable safety belts. The CHMSL is added later probably, because Corniche II (with color-keyed bumpers and mirrors) was available since 1986 MY on North American market. | 2015-05-16 09:32 | ||
| MisterZ | Looks like 1986+ due to CHMSL?![[Image: vlcsnap-2015-05-16-15h35m44s573.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/7206/vlcsnap-2015-05-16-15h35m44s573.jpg) |
2015-05-16 07:38 | ||
| karoomay | I'm now viewing this image on a better and brighter screen and now I can tell it has the 1991+ grille. Oops, my bad! |
2015-05-16 01:33 | ||
| night cub | I think Baube is right. The bumpers are the newer version with the grooves. | 2015-05-16 00:05 | ||
| Baube | the headlights are large for a 1988-1990. zoom in a little bit, you'll see .gif ";)") |
2015-05-15 23:58 | ||
eLMeR  | 1984+ or 1985+? Most pictures I can find from L-Series trucks with the oval above the grille are said to be 1985+ models only  It also looks like having a short nose, but the view point may mislead. Could it be a LN-Series? -- Last edit: 2015-05-15 22:29:06 |
2015-05-15 22:25 | ||
| Donovan Savage | 1984+ Ford L-Series | 2015-05-15 19:36 | ||
| l300 | 1989 | 2015-05-15 19:18 | ||
| Ford_Guy | 1988-1989 Ford LTD Crown Victoria Wagon. | 2015-05-15 18:54 | ||
| Ford_Guy | LX models dressed up as police cars. | 2015-05-15 18:53 | ||
| 130rapid | For sure 1976+ (front bumper with extra space for plate, and new dashboard). But it's probably Corniche Series II even, because rectangular side mirror. Do we have any other shots? Just a BIT different point of view. -- Last edit: 2015-05-15 20:55:43 |
2015-05-15 18:48 |
Werbung
