Werbung Zuletzt erstellte Filmseiten
Ford AeroMax 
Typ: Lkw, Sattelschlepper — Herkunftsland: 
![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Fahrzeug im Hintergrund
Kommentare über dieses Fahrzeug| Autor | Mitteilung |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2013-02-02 03:37 |
![[Image: bowlingcolumbinefootagemissile1.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/784/bowlingcolumbinefootagemissile1.jpg) Footage of an ICBM being transported from the Lockheed Martin factory near Columbine. |
|
◊ 2013-02-02 03:39 |
ICBM? |
|
◊ 2013-02-02 03:40 |
Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile. |
|
◊ 2013-02-02 03:41 |
Intercontinental Ballistic Missile. Also known as a big waste of money and good for nothing. |
|
◊ 2013-02-02 03:48 |
Just like a Rolls Royce Camargue then? |
|
(inactive user) ◊ 2013-02-02 04:23 |
I thought that such very background vehicles in a documentary are not worth listing/not allowed. |
|
◊ 2013-02-02 04:37 |
Yeah. What difference does it make what kind of truck it is, especially when you can hardly tell what kind of truck it is and it is probably not a rare or unusual truck? -- Last edit: 2013-02-02 22:33:18 (G-MANN) |
|
◊ 2013-02-02 05:35 |
Well, It's a Ford Aeromax. Rare enough up here? |
|
◊ 2013-02-02 22:35 |
Well, they would deliberately have chosen this footage of an ICBM being transported so it's more relevant than something like this: /vehicle_116791-Toyota-Van-1984.html But I could still move it to the comments if enough people think I should. |
|
◊ 2013-02-03 02:09 |
IMO, I'd say it should stay if it is identifiable (especially as it has some kind of role). And we've got a name from rtsbusman so we can go with that. -- Last edit: 2013-02-03 02:10:03 |
|
(inactive user) ◊ 2013-02-03 02:40 |
I do not think it matters if it can be identifiable or not. I think it is rather about the picture quality, amount of discernability and importance. It is still a dark and blurry picture of a very background 1-star vehicle in a documentary entry. -- Last edit: 2013-02-03 02:42:48 |
Kommentar hinzufügen Werbung Werbung
