Publicité
Dernières fiches de films complétées
1980 Citroën GSA Palas 
Catégorie : Voitures, Berline à hayon — Origine du modèle :
— Lieu de fabrication :
— Fabriqué pour : 

![]()
![]()
![]()
Véhicule fort utilisé par un personnage principal ou pendant longtemps
Commentaires sur ce véhicle| Auteur | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2006-01-08 11:14 |
It is a GSA Pallas, visible from the grille with the chrome edge, the rear view mirror and the wheels. It is however missing the striping. I guess they forget to put that back with the new paint job. Also it is built between 1979 and 1982, visible from the kind of type indication they used. Models prior to 1982 had a grey strip on the back, with on the left side the modelindication and on the right side 'Citroen GSA'. This is not visible from this image, but from another image in the movie. -- Last edit: 2006-01-08 12:03:53 |
|
◊ 2006-01-08 15:53 |
A little correction to my previous message. Since it is in Spain, the type is not 'Pallas' but 'Palas'. From what I can see for my Spanish brochure for this, the equipment level is the same as Pallas models from other countries. A little odd that only the model name is different, since the other models are alike. Maybe one of the Spanish readers can explain this? -- Last edit: 2006-01-08 16:01:18 |
|
◊ 2006-01-08 16:04 |
If I am correct, in spanish the words are written as they are pronounced. So they change foreign words to match the pronounciation. |
|
◊ 2006-01-08 16:06 |
Thanks ![]() |
|
◊ 2006-01-08 16:18 |
In spanish the double ll is pronounced like j, in this case the sound would be almost the same as the spanish word payaso. More or less the same meaning as clown. Not flattering for fine machinery like this. |
|
◊ 2006-01-08 16:20 |
![]() |
|
◊ 2006-01-08 21:48 |
I am sorry but I think it is better to put 1979 instead of 1982, see my previous comments: This one has the grey strip, so it is built between 1979 and 1982.. -- Last edit: 2006-01-08 21:48:18 |
|
◊ 2006-01-08 21:49 |
Done ![]() |
|
(inactive user) ◊ 2012-10-16 10:51 |
![]() I would not give it 4 stars, rather 3 as it was not used extensively. -- Last edit: 2012-10-16 11:20:27 |
Ajouter un commentaire
Publicité
Publicité