Advertising Last completed movie pages
1998 Audi A8 D2 [Typ 4D] Comments about this vehicle| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2009-05-10 21:20 |
1998 Audi A8 D2 (Typ 4D) -- Last edit: 2020-06-02 15:18:04 |
|
◊ 2009-05-11 14:44 |
Do we really need to put default years on cars like Audis, Mercs, BMWs and VWs which have their own model codes? |
|
◊ 2009-05-11 14:49 |
Yes, because there are two A8 D2 models: the 1994+ one, the first model, and the 1999+ one, the restlyng model. And that seems to be a first generation model .gif ";)") |
|
◊ 2009-05-11 14:58 |
It would be better if you wrote 1994+ or 1994-1998 because in your first comment it looks like it's a 1994-only model. |
|
◊ 2009-05-11 15:02 |
That's a good idea Atom, but it should be made for other brands too, otherwise, like you say, it makes us think that this model is specifically from 1994, i like more the "xxxx-xxxx" thing than the one year numbering, unless we know it is exactly form an exact year because things like the plate or other details identify it as such. |
|
◊ 2009-05-11 15:31 |
I know what Walter meant, the thing is you can only add one year into the year field. |
|
◊ 2009-05-11 15:43 |
True, well Antoine might be able to make it bigger? |
|
◊ 2009-05-11 15:52 |
I'd rather have a default year, entering a year range at the top would look a bit clumsy. |
|
◊ 2009-05-11 16:42 |
Not a question of being bigger: the year is stored as a number, not as text... And indeed a range is probably not so useful, we have comments for that, it is know that year entered is the first possible year or most probably year in many cases. -- Last edit: 2009-05-11 16:43:03 |
|
◊ 2009-05-11 18:16 |
Not every car has comments of it's year i don't see how having a range would be worse, but well, up to you... |
Add a comment Advertising Advertising
![1998 Audi A8 D2 [Typ 4D]](i227321.jpg)
![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
