Pictures provided by: Lateef
Also known as:
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2011-03-14 18:20 |
Some cars seen at the beginning of the movie... ... but nothing really worth listing. And that's all in the movie (except if I missed something) -- Last edit: 2011-03-14 18:20:11 |
◊ 2011-07-04 17:42 |
On this images, just two LTIs, on the first is something like a Corsa, a Scénic or a Multipla on the third, and on the fifth is unknown |
◊ 2011-08-30 23:16 |
You missed one indeed - it's a Humber which appears in the scene where Dumbledore meets Tom Riddle for the first time (I've just added it). |
AMC man ◊ 2011-10-13 16:46 |
The car on the fifth car is a Chrysler PT cruiser. |
◊ 2011-10-13 16:51 |
You mean the car on the fifth pic? |
AMC man ◊ 2011-10-13 19:59 |
Yes I do. |
◊ 2011-12-04 13:48 |
And now I've also added a bike I didn't notice the last time I watched the movie. |
tom11 ◊ 2011-12-04 17:02 |
The LTIs look well seen enough to list. |
◊ 2011-12-04 20:44 |
the cars are better seen then the bike... and its nearly impossible to see which bike it is, but there are 3 cars you could recognise. Renault Espace, Chrysler PT Cruser and 2 LTIs. so why you added the bike? |
tom11 ◊ 2011-12-04 20:48 |
The bike looks somewhat custom jugging by the look of the gas tank. |
◊ 2011-12-04 20:55 |
The cars are not seen better than the bike. The bike is seen for about fifteen seconds, in a scene where Harry talks to Arthur Weasley. The cars, however are CGI and only there for a less than a quarter of a second, plus they're too background. And it's nearly impossible to tell what bike it is... to you. You never know, some do have knowledge about bikes, and this one seems identifiable to me. Vehicles get listed even though they appear unidentifiable at first. Frankly, I don't care if you can recognise the cars, they're not worth listing. Why I added the bike? Because it's there. It's actually part of the props, is there for some time, and is not part of some half-assed CGI crap barely seen. Problem? -- Last edit: 2011-12-04 21:01:20 |
◊ 2011-12-04 21:08 |
And, um... why are you saying that here, on the main page? |
tom11 ◊ 2011-12-04 21:18 |
I think the LTIs, the Chrysler PT cruiser, and the Renault Espace are all worth there own pages. |
◊ 2011-12-04 21:21 |
Sure you do. And I'm not surprised. |
◊ 2011-12-05 07:35 |
i dont wanted to make you angry Lateef. It was just a question, because i wondered why you added the bike. But now that you said its seen 15 seconds, i understand. I thought its just seen for a second or something... |
◊ 2011-12-05 18:04 |
I wasn't angry, even though I probably sounded like it I understand why you asked the question, now. I actually thought for a second back then that your question was meant as a complaint, silly me |
◊ 2016-10-09 10:56 |
@Alexander_097: your submission appears to be that of a behind-the-scenes footage, which we do not accept as entries: |
◊ 2016-10-09 13:21 |
So what means "an extra DVD contents"? |
◊ 2016-10-09 13:24 |
cf my comment there on the other Harry Potter page: /yourcomments.php?archiveformovie=304141 (some admins archive maybe a little too quickly the comments, if you hadn't time to see it...) |
◊ 2016-10-09 13:49 |
Ok, thank you. |