Advertising Last completed movie pages
1993 Plymouth Voyager [AS] 
Class: Cars, Van / MPV — Model origin: 
![1993 Plymouth Voyager [AS]](i008236.jpg)
00:33:19 ![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Vehicle used a lot by a main character or for a long time
Comments about this vehicle| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2005-02-23 21:17 |
Conduite par Tom Cruise lors de la première vague d'attaque Alien... |
|
◊ 2005-08-01 23:27 |
The Voyager is not an SUV nor is it 4x4. It's a mini-van. |
|
◊ 2005-08-01 23:31 |
I wonder why it was classified as SUV  |
|
◊ 2005-11-07 23:48 |
![[Image: plymouth0019078xj.4712.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/0is6/plymouth0019078xj.4712.jpg) ![[Image: plymouth0032021qg.1624.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/0is6/plymouth0032021qg.1624.jpg) |
|
Rocker B. J. ◊ 2006-01-14 08:13 |
1994 Plymouth Voyager |
|
explorer4x4 ◊ 2006-06-13 00:58 |
Best car in the movie! |
|
◊ 2006-06-24 23:01 |
what makes you say that? |
|
◊ 2006-06-25 00:11 |
I think the jury is still out on that one, btw, its van, not a car, and you need to see alot more movies.......... |
|
◊ 2006-08-30 23:26 |
My famliy had one of these. They aren't that reliable. I'm just shocked that it didnt get crushed by that plane that destroyed the whole neighborhood around it. |
|
◊ 2006-09-06 00:02 |
lol... must admit, for a 3.3L with a604 it sure had some balls in the movie... |
|
◊ 2006-09-06 05:11 |
This is more like a '92 or a '93, the '94 had a different front bumper. |
|
◊ 2006-09-27 19:06 |
could be.. the color im not sure about.. i have a 94 shortbase base model and mines the teal color... this is quite a light blue... maybe its just a mut lol... |
|
◊ 2006-10-04 06:32 |
Mwtspirit: "lol... must admit, for a 3.3L with a604 it sure had some balls in the movie..." I think since this van was the regular wheelbase it had the 3.0 Mitsubishi V6 but I agree with you about the balls lol |
|
◊ 2007-04-24 18:56 |
First post on here but I must say (And I would know) that this van is a 93. It has the 91-93 dashboard and the 93-95 exterior plastic door handles. The 84-92 had the square chrome door handles. I'm still unsure what engine is in it though but I believe it is the 3.0 |
|
◊ 2007-05-20 20:56 |
Actually, the 1991-1995 Plymouth Voyager, Chrysler Town&Country, and the Dodge Caravan shared the same platform, the Chrysler AS platform. The Dodge caravan was available with front-wheel-drive, or All-wheel drive. This may have contributed to the confusion as to labeling it as an SUV.-(Source: Dodge Caravan-Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) -- Last edit: 2007-06-19 22:29:45 |
|
◊ 2007-08-01 04:01 |
Some scens filmed with this van looked fake. But I liked the van anyway. |
|
◊ 2007-11-14 23:34 |
It's not a 3.0L V6,it's a 2.5L 4 cyl,heres how I know,the air intake(houses the air cleaner)is shown on the van's first scene when the hood is opened... .gif ";)") -- Last edit: 2007-11-14 23:37:29 |
|
◊ 2007-11-23 19:25 |
In which case, it definitely had balls.  The old Chrysler 2.2/2.5 was a pretty touch series of engines, especially the turbo variants. |
|
◊ 2007-12-09 21:02 |
I agree  ,scence it was a 2.5L 4cyl,it like totaly had balls in the movie.  -- Last edit: 2007-12-11 04:22:24 |
|
◊ 2008-02-24 18:46 |
This is actually a 1992, not a 1993. |
|
◊ 2008-04-13 02:20 |
This is a 1993  , 1984-1992 models had chrome door handles, 1993-1995 models had black ones, and this van has the 1991-1993 hubcaps, dash, and black door handles. |
|
◊ 2008-04-13 02:21 |
Hey you! go back to whereever you have been until now! |
|
◊ 2009-02-07 09:17 |
y'know when all those people wanted the van and they kept jumping on it? And then Ray sped up and came to a woman carrying a baby? Well, I don't understand why Ray didn't just run her over |
|
◊ 2009-02-07 14:32 |
Um, because she....had a baby? |
|
◊ 2009-03-04 01:00 |
He could've just went around her, then they wouldn't have lost the van to the mob, sucks that they lost the van. |
|
◊ 2011-03-10 19:24 |
deleted comment |
|
◊ 2011-04-11 01:16 |
This van also appeared in an episode of Glee, heres a link: /vehicle_269543-Plymouth-Voyager-1992.html |
|
◊ 2011-04-11 01:35 |
And in a Toyota commercial: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80pNUxIczig Apparently faux wood = dorkiness. Philistines. |
|
◊ 2011-04-11 02:00 |
Well I think that kid is right (not that I really agree with the "big SUVs make good family cars" idea). And isn't that the "crappy minivan" that used to be in Malcolm in the Middle? -- Last edit: 2011-04-11 02:05:00 |
|
◊ 2011-04-11 02:25 |
Wood body work looks good on some vehicles. No so sure its right for a minivan like above. The Ford Flex has purposeful body panels that evoke wood body work without actually using wood. So that style is still used in automotive design. |
|
◊ 2011-04-11 13:20 |
@Neptune: it's a matter of taste For me there is nearly no other extra feature of cars, which is so extreme useless and which makes such a painful sight of pure plastic-fake as these false wood-looking tape. Everyone knows, that it's plastic, but it's still in wooden optic - odd as nothing else. And your last sentence could be reduced to "still used in US automotive design" In Europe, Asia, South America or Australia noone has a faible for it. Just some wood-appications in the dashboard are sometimes placed, but not on the outside.The ancient British "Woddies" as the Morris Minor Traveller are not in this category, as their bodywork, at least the back, was indeed wooden made. |
|
◊ 2011-04-11 18:57 |
Really still used? I''ve thought it was ended in mid 90's with GM fullsize station wagons. |
|
◊ 2011-04-11 22:36 |
I have seen a Ford Flex with the faux wood but I assumed they were all aftermarket Like this one however I do know that the 2002-2004 Jeep Liberty (and Cherokee outside of N.A.) had a Wagoneer option that included faux wood paneling and 'Wagoneer" badging: ![[Image: 3779046029_a4afe6d82e.jpg]](http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2462/3779046029_a4afe6d82e.jpg "http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2462/3779046029_a4afe6d82e.jpg") |
|
◊ 2011-04-11 22:45 |
They would be aftermarket add-ons. The Flex doesn’t come with faux wood from the factory. The door panels on the Flex are ribbed to call to mind the woody look of old station wagons. ![[Image: 9e947a127531009.jpg]](http://pics.imcdb.org/0ib/9e947a127531009.jpg) |
|
◊ 2011-04-11 22:59 |
Ah! I get what your saying now Neptune |
|
◊ 2011-04-11 23:04 |
Well, that’s what the Flex’s chief design engineer (can’t remember his name at the moment) intended those lines to represent. I didn’t really get that, until I read an article on the Flex and its design elements. |
|
◊ 2011-04-12 04:52 |
It looks a bit like MINI designed that car. That wood-panelled Jeep Liberty looks pretty bad, it almost seems like a joke (because basically wood-panelling is a very dated styling feature) Even if it was real wood, why would you really want wood panels stuck onto your car's bodywork? Wood should be on the inside of a car, not the outside. -- Last edit: 2011-04-12 05:01:11 |
|
◊ 2011-04-12 05:13 |
It favors the MINI with the white roof yes, but you don’t have to get the white, which is purely optional, it normally has a body colored roof. I think it can be ordered with a black roof, but don’t quote me on that. I prefer the white roof though. |
|
◊ 2011-04-12 05:19 |
It's also like a Mini in the door handles and overall shape (like a Clubman except much longer) |
|
◊ 2011-04-12 06:28 |
The first thumbnail has a sign advertising fiberglass repairs.  |
|
◊ 2011-04-12 11:19 |
Because decades ago station wagons had wooden bodywork..and later faux wood panels, which resemble that bodywork were item of top-of-the-line models.... |
|
◊ 2011-04-12 16:20 |
Previous entry in that contest was 1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer, which was Grand Cherokee with fux wood paneling. They really had a nostalgia about old SJ Wagoneer. |
|
◊ 2011-05-31 04:20 |
Link to "www.cinemavehicles.com" ??? |
|
◊ 2011-05-31 04:22 |
Maybe, I can't tell for sure. |
|
◊ 2011-05-31 04:24 |
It does look a lot like it. Can CVS tells us if it was used in this film? |
|
◊ 2011-05-31 04:27 |
Yes, you're more than welcome to email Bob, their spokesman: bob@cinemavehicles.com Just tell him you're with IMCDb. He said we were welcome to contact him anytime we had questions. |
|
◊ 2011-05-31 04:27 |
If they can tell which one(s) it was in, I'm curious about lot #C1992, the orange Eclipse. |
|
◊ 2011-05-31 04:30 |
Great, I’ll e-mail them tomorrow then and see what he says. Thanks. |
|
◊ 2011-06-02 04:11 |
Its a 1993 model according to CVS. |
|
◊ 2011-08-21 01:51 |
That was an older model. Link: /vehicle_45184-Plymouth-Grand-Voyager-1990.html |
|
◊ 2012-06-08 15:01 |
Why does this one work because the solenoids were changed? Thats basically to say that the emp only fused fitted parts, and not spare one. Watch out for that massive plot hole.... Whoops, you fell into it. And if i was Ray, i woulda had the solenoids on my badass shelby changed, not this piece of shit. |
|
◊ 2012-11-04 06:41 |
The poor thing gets torn to pieces throughout the movie |
|
◊ 2014-08-19 22:15 |
It has mercedes logo on the front |
|
◊ 2014-08-19 22:24 |
The hood ornament is a Chrysler Pentastar. |
|
◊ 2014-11-03 23:10 |
There was also an INCREDIBLE amount of cars this drives past in this scene, hundreds. |
|
◊ 2018-10-08 04:26 |
The one from Malcolm in the Middle was 1987-1990, and an LWB... |
Add a comment Advertising Advertising
