Advertising 
Last completed movie pages 1992 Fiat Cinquecento [170]
Class: Cars, Supermini — Model origin: 
— Built in: 
![1992 Fiat Cinquecento [170]](images/077/351.jpg)
Background vehicle
Comments about this vehicle| Author | Message |
|---|---|
2006-12-31 11:31
| Cinquecento. |
2006-12-31 13:11
| The blue wagon might be interesting. It's a Nissan Sunny Florida. |
2007-01-01 10:34
| Please change flag into own field,'cause in Italy that car was imported by FSM-Fiat Poland's plant,so not made in Italy,but in Poland(Cinquecentos type[170]lasted thru 1992 to 1998) |
2007-01-01 12:25
| Made in Poland, but still considered as an Italian car and not as a Polish car, no? (A Renault Clio is not a Turkish car for example, though it is produced there) Though that in this case as Fiat has some background in Poland, maybe we should consider this one as a Polish car... I do not know -- Last edit: 2007-01-01 12:28:20 |
2007-11-24 22:28
| In this case (abroad) the 'Italian origin' just with 'made in PL' is ok. Only the very early ones with FSM badge can have 'PL origin'. |
2007-11-24 22:36
| Why those with FSM badge would have a different origin than those with Fiat badge? It is the same model, no? |
2007-11-24 22:38
| The FSM badge takes away the Italian spirit ;p |
2007-11-24 22:39
| But were produced under licence by independent in this time company and badged as FSM and Fiat - some sources named them this way. -- Last edit: 2007-11-24 22:41:30 |
2007-11-24 23:09
| But who designed/conceived that model? |
2007-11-24 23:10
| A sadist. |
2007-11-26 17:12
| The car was designed by Italians for the manufacturing in Poland (a bit similar like with Dacia Logan). Though it is not so simple, it was a project done together by Fiat and 1980's Polish government (they were a real sadists indeed), we (or rather they - sadists) prepared the plants and everything what is need for the production. That's why at least these early ones with different badging deserves for PL origin. Maybe it is actually not bad idea to move 'FSM' to the 'make field'. -- Last edit: 2007-11-26 17:16:23 |
2007-11-26 18:02
| I'd maybe list all as PL then |
2007-11-27 16:32
| No, is ok now. I wouldn't change this. |
Add a comment
