Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2014-07-05 22:58 |
|
◊ 2014-07-05 23:24 |
More formally of 1969 Chevrolet Impala Sport Sedan, model 16439. /vehicle_4227-Chevrolet-Impala-16439-1969.html /vehicle_113910-Chevrolet-Impala-16439-1969.html /vehicle_114332-Chevrolet-Impala-16439-1969.html /vehicle_226601-Chevrolet-Impala-16439-1969.html /vehicle_243705-Chevrolet-Impala-16439-1969.html /vehicle_288562-Chevrolet-Impala-16439-1969.html /vehicle_485191-Chevrolet-Impala-16439-1969.html /vehicle_580821-Chevrolet-Impala-16439-1969.html |
◊ 2014-12-04 09:11 |
It would seem like a good idea to keep re-using and recycling props for a film studio or production company. I'm sure it works just fine for interior set pieces, or street-scene furniture such as fire hydrants, bins, signposts and such, but vehicles - especially as distinctive and familiar as this big old rusty Impala? I think they should finally pay for it to be restored or re-sprayed, at least. No matter how good/bad a picture is, you think that out of the millions which gets spent on a typical big-studio movie or mainstream TV series they'd do some research and not re-use less-discreet-looking props that have been in various other productions? Call me picky, but to me it seems rather cheap and lazy. Maybe it works just the once, or a couple of times - like The (Big Lebowski) Dude's Ford Torino appearing in The X-Files, but at least it wasn't milked THIS many times! -- Last edit: 2014-12-04 09:13:59 |