impdb.org

IGCD

[ Login ]

Advertising

Last completed movie pages

The In-Laws; Riding High; Motýl; Mystery Woman: Mystery Weekend; 臨時劫案; The Beekeeper; Visions; Dunkirk; Nilgün; Ztracená revue; Cinq colonnes à la une; Son Baskın; The Area 51 Incident; Half Minded; 三燕迎春; (more...)

1966 AMC Ambassador

1966 AMC Ambassador in Dark City, Movie, 1998

Class: Cars, Sedan — Model origin:

1966 AMC Ambassador

Background vehicle

Comments about this vehicle

Author	Message
tom11 ◊ 2012-02-21 18:23	Is that a converted steering wheel? because I don't see a lot of radio antennaes on the same side of the driver.
dsl ◊ 2012-02-22 03:50	Merc 250SE??
Ingo ◊ 2012-02-22 22:51	dsl wrote Merc 250SE?? No. The general shape is similar, but no detail fits.
DynaMike ◊ 2012-02-23 00:11	Circa 1966 AMC Ambassador would be my guess...
tom11 ◊ 2012-03-24 14:25	DynaMike wrote Circa 1966 AMC Ambassador would be my guess... No.
Lateef ◊ 2012-03-24 14:31	.. and who are you to say no, just like that? If it's not an Ambassador, what is it, then? I think it matches pretty good.
Gomselmash11 ◊ 2012-03-24 19:10	I'd go for the Ambassador, too.
owlman ◊ 2012-03-24 22:02	tom11 wrote Is that a converted steering wheel? because I don't see a lot of radio antennaes on the same side of the driver. It's so thick... probably a CB antenna or something.
tom11 ◊ 2012-03-24 22:19	Lateef wrote .. and who are you to say no, just like that? If it's not an Ambassador, what is it, then? I think it matches pretty good. Lateef: I'm saying no because the AMC Ambassador does not have rear vent-windows like this one has, and the front vent-windows are shaped different, and the AMC Ambassador doesn't have so much chrome strips under and above the door handles http://carphotos.cardomain.com/ride_images/3/2659/4561/31647280001_large.jpg -- Last edit: 2012-03-24 22:19:40
Lateef ◊ 2012-03-24 22:33	Peek this: http://www.suberdave.com/index/ambassador_tn.jpg
tom11 ◊ 2012-03-24 22:37	Lateef wrote Peek this: http://www.suberdave.com/index/ambassador_tn.jpg Yes, thats a good match, but what year is the one in your link?
Lateef ◊ 2012-03-24 22:37	'66
tom11 ◊ 2012-03-24 23:18	Lateef wrote '66 Lateef, the one in my link was also a '66, yet the one in your link looks a lot different from the one in my link. Was the one in your link made for a foreign market or something?
Sandie ◊ 2012-03-24 23:21	Doesn't the one in your link have a vinyl roof or is that painted? That would cover the vent windows.
Lateef ◊ 2012-03-24 23:21	Actually, the one in your link is in fact a 1967, not a 1966. If you found it by search as a 1966, it was probably mislabeled.
Lateef ◊ 2012-03-24 23:29	I inspected your link more closely, and I scrolled down to the guestbook to check for comments, this was the first that I stumbled upon: Quote Nice car. The only problem is that this car is no '66. It's a '67 and is a completely different car then a '66. Different body, different engines etc. So, like I said, a common case of mislabeling
tom11 ◊ 2012-03-27 21:02	OK, so I agree on AMC Ambassador then.
Lateef ◊ 2012-03-27 21:03	I'm glad.

Add a comment

Advertising

Watch or buy this title - Powered by JustWatch

Advertising