[ Login ]

Advertising

Last completed movie pages

1974 Mercedes-Benz 450 SEL [W116]

1974 Mercedes-Benz 450 SEL [W116] in For Your Eyes Only, Movie, 1981 IMDB

Class: Cars, Sedan — Model origin: DE

1974 Mercedes-Benz 450 SEL [W116]

Position 00:19:01 [*][*][*] Vehicle used by a character or in a car chase

Comments about this vehicle

AuthorMessage

Mauresque

2004-07-24 20:19

Quote

je posede la meme en bleu foncer une tres belle voiture et tres chique

Kowalski UK

2004-11-29 02:16

Quote

Mercedes-Benz 350 SEL W116.

tata CA

2004-11-30 19:16

Quote

dans james bond, les méchants on touvours eu des mercedes

Kowalski UK

2005-09-28 16:24

Quote

Accordingly with this source: Link to "www.hampstead.com.au"

The car was a 280 SE (Short Wheel Base).

It was sad to see, such beauty to go over the cliff and end upside down. I think they should have used a Citroen DS instead or maybe a 1970's Volvo Estate...

I think this is one of the few scenes, where a car hits the bottom of a cliff and it don't explode, most of films, where a car goes over a cliff or simply rollover, the car always explodes.

antp BE

2005-09-28 20:03

Quote

No, not a DS :p

Kowalski UK

2005-09-28 21:23

Quote

Quote No, not a DS :p


OK, how about a VW Kombi...or a Fiat 131...Volvo 240 Estate...

antp BE

2005-10-30 21:47

Quote

An extra picture:
[Image: mercedes0116352ba.9344.jpg]

Actually it is not a 280 or a 350, but a 450 SEL, at least in the scene where Bond hits the car with his gun:
[Image: mercedes0115426tv.3236.jpg]

Ralph DE

2006-04-22 19:44

Quote

On the first picture is a 280 SE or 280 S, also on the second. I have ownd the same car for a long time.

antp BE

2006-04-22 19:51

Quote

So they used multiple cars?

Sammy J. E. FI

2006-05-03 18:07

Quote

Ralph wrote On the first picture is a 280 SE or 280 S, also on the second. I have ownd the same car for a long time.


How do You spot the different models from outside if the vehicles are debadged or fake badged? Doesn´t a 280S look exactly the same as 450SE chassiwise? SEL-models of course are longer than SE.


-- Last edit: 2006-05-03 18:08:30

joonas222 FI

2006-10-24 18:27

Quote

it is 280 se or 450 sel

-- Last edit: 2006-10-24 18:27:53

TheHeartbreakKid15 EN

2007-11-17 22:37

Quote

antp wrote So they used multiple cars?


Yeah they were different locations so i'd say they did

Kooshmeister US

2008-03-17 19:22

Quote

Yeah one was in Spain, the other in gosh I forget where, somewhere in Greece. Both cars were used by the assassin Locque, though, so either Locque just has a thing for Mercedes or he had his car from Spain brought to Greece.

mister car from 971 GP

2008-07-04 03:03

Quote

C'est vrai! C'est inoui que cette Merco n'ait pas pris feu après avoir fait des tonneaux en tombant de la falaise! Et c'est tant mieux! Mais c'est vraiment dommage que les scénaristes de ce James Bond l'aient détruite! Honte à eux! Détruire une si belle Merco des 70's! Un véritable sacrilège!

mister car from 971 GP

2008-07-04 03:04

Quote

PS:Où sont les images de la Merco tombant de la falaise?

mister car from 971 GP

2008-07-04 03:11

Quote

Au fait, j'aimerais ajouter que Rien que pour vos yeux n'est pas le seul film au monde où l'on peut voir une voiture tomber d'une falaise et s'écraser au fond de celle-ci sans qu'elle n'explose! Ce fut le cas auparavant dans La Grande Menace (1978) où l'on voit une voiture des années 30 tomber du haut d'une falaise en Angleterre et s'écraser non loin de la mer sans qu'elle ne s'enflamme! Mais elle fut complètement détruite après cette horrible chute! Et ce sera le cas une quinzaine d'années plus tard dans La Jurée (1996) où, à moment donné, James Gandolfini (Tony Soprano, pour qui ceux ne le savent pas) envoie une Cadillac Sedan DeVille bleue datant de la fin des 70's ou du début des 80's au fond d'une falaise et cette dernière n'a pas pris feu! Et pour cause: le véhicule est tombé dans l'eau après cette dégringolade!

G-MANN UK

2008-10-08 17:26

Quote

[Image: fyeomercsclass4rg7.9096.jpg]

Used by Locque (Michael Gothard). When it ends up teetering over a cliff, Bond kicks it over, avenging the deaths of all those Locque killed.

[Image: fyeomercsclass6ux2.5784.jpg] [Image: fyeomercsclass7mh0.2349.jpg] [Image: fyeomercsclass8av0.580.jpg] [Image: fyeomercsclass9gj5.4910.jpg] [Image: fyeomercsclass10je7.8567.jpg]

"He had no head for heights."

-- Last edit: 2008-10-08 18:11:05

G-MANN UK

2008-10-08 17:27

Quote

To end this debate, the 450SEL badge can be seen in the scene this car first appears as well as the scene later on.

-- Last edit: 2008-10-08 17:27:59

Kowalski UK

2012-04-18 14:45

Quote

If he were driving the 6.9 V8 he would have escaped. Anyway, kicking Locque's teetering Merc off the cliff was Roger Moore's only ruthless moment as James Bond. Still a waste of a nice car, though. They could have destroyed the lesser 280 S model instead.

-- Last edit: 2012-04-18 14:47:26

Weasel1984 PL

2012-04-18 15:53

Quote

Kowalski wrote kicking Locque's teetering Merc off the cliff was Roger Moore's only ruthless moment as James Bond...

Can't agree - he hit Maud Adams in face in "The Man With Golden Gun", thrown out from the boat the kid, who helped him to start the engine (same film) and finally(!), in "The Spy Who Loved Me", he pushed from the roof the guy, despite he told him everything what was able to tell (I mean the one, who grabbed him by the tie). Sadist, not Bond!

Nightrider RU

2012-04-18 16:01

Quote

Weasel1984 wrote
...he hit Maud Adams in face...


It was okay.

Weasel1984 PL

2012-04-18 16:24

Quote

He had ruthless look in this moment. :o

Nightrider RU

2012-04-18 19:23

Quote

Come on, special special agent is supposed to be ruthless!

ingo DE

2012-04-18 21:54

Quote

G-MANN wrote To end this debate, the 450SEL badge can be seen in the scene this car first appears as well as the scene later on.

But the car on the main pic and the car, thrown from the cliff, isn't one. For sure a shorter SE, if you note the length of the back door.

Kowalski UK

2012-04-19 14:15

Quote

Weasel1984 wrote
Can't agree - he hit Maud Adams in face in "The Man With Golden Gun",


Not much worse than being shot in the heart by Scaramanga.

Weasel1984 wrote thrown out from the boat the kid, who helped him to start the engine (same film)


He actually saved the kid from getting into a serious stituation. Imagine if a gun fight ensued during the boat chase. Would you be OK with the kid getting shot?

Weasel1984 wrote and finally(!), in "The Spy Who Loved Me", he pushed from the roof the guy, despite he told him everything what was able to tell (I mean the one, who grabbed him by the tie). Sadist, not Bond!


Nothing wrong with that. Come to think of it, kicking Locque's Mercedes off a cliff was Moore's second ruthless moment as Bond.

-- Last edit: 2012-04-19 17:21:14

ingo DE

2012-04-19 21:06

Quote

More ruthless und unscrupolos than James Bond are the makers of him: all these monstrously cobbled license-plates -in ALL Bond-movies- are inexcusable :o

Weasel1984 PL

2012-04-21 19:58

Quote

Kowalski wrote Not much worse than being shot in the heart by Scaramanga.

Scaramanga was a villain (and some kind of mutant), so hard to compare them. :/

Kowalski wrote Imagine if a gun fight ensued during the boat chase. Would you be OK with the kid getting shot?

No. [Image: shy-smiley-17312.gif]
Ok, I felt this one can be debatable.

Anyway definitely not so innocent guy. :o

robi DE

2012-05-14 11:04

Quote

Locque got what he deserved, he ordered the killing of Timothy Havelock and his wife, and murdered Luigi Ferrara (MI:6-Contact in Italy).

Add a comment

You must login to post comments...