Advertising Last completed movie pages
1952 Fiat 1400 [101] 
Class: Cars, Sedan — Model origin: 
![1952 Fiat 1400 [101]](i240285.jpg)
![[*]](/res/star.png){kind=small}
Background vehicle
Comments about this vehicle| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
◊ 2009-07-23 08:38 |
1954 Fiat 1400 A |
|
◊ 2012-06-26 13:19 |
I'd say 1952 1400 [101 E3] because tail lights. Also, 1400A has larger rear window. |
|
◊ 2012-06-26 13:54 |
please adjust the chassis code format to those we arleady have at the site in case of the other Fiats so it will be 101E.3 - there were these dots at the plates in many types (though of course possible that not in all of them). But to keep order it is good to decide on one version only and all codes we have with dots. -- Last edit: 2012-06-26 13:57:47 |
|
◊ 2012-06-26 14:08 |
If we shall use this code with dot them '101.E3' more likely than 101E.3 (which exists nowhere). However http://www.zuckerfabrik24.de/fiat/fiat1400_p.htm use '101 E3' (non dot) code. |
|
◊ 2012-06-26 14:13 |
It is matter of typing, usually in case of many models it was number(without space)letter dot digit (I mean the plate at the car). In fact for the car, it is not so important where it is, or is it with or without dot (and possible that Fiat used few systems, I haven't seen the 1400 plate), the point is we use version xxxZ.Y1. The zuckerfabrik also doesn't use any letter in case of the early 1400: http://www.zuckerfabrik24.de/fiat/fiatdaten_pc50.htm -- Last edit: 2012-06-26 14:16:52 |
|
◊ 2012-06-26 14:16 |
I'm thinking about '101' code just for 1950-1953 FIAT 1400 because E1, E2 and E3 digits are just factory codes for prototypes. |
|
◊ 2012-06-26 14:21 |
So back to the "101" only? The question is - is it worth to use proto codes, when serial cars codes are known (I admit, when "serial" are unknown protypic can be useful). -- Last edit: 2012-06-26 14:21:32 |
|
◊ 2012-06-26 14:43 |
Good idea. |
Add a comment Advertising Advertising
