igcd.net

[ Login ]

Advertising

Last completed movie pages

Baby Face; Landspeed; Kim Wilde: The Touch; Taxi; Lotta på Bråkmakargatan; Gandhi; Små mirakel och stora; Szerokiej drogi, kochanie; Rocky; Und tschüss! In Amerika; The Living Daylights; Up Periscope; Hell and High Water; Heroes; Pennies from Heaven; (more...)

1969 Beaumont

1969 Beaumont in Born to Run, Movie, 1993

Class: Cars, Coupé — Model origin:

1969 Beaumont

Minor action vehicle or used in only a short scene

Comments about this vehicle

Author	Message
Wampa-One 2008-02-29 23:49	Chevelle, I guess?
rjluna2 2008-03-01 02:23	1969.
Skid 2008-03-01 16:09	Either a 1968 or 1969...I don't think it's possible to tell without seeing the grille or taillights.
rjluna2 2008-03-01 18:10	Turning signal/parking lamp position at the bumper and smaller federally mandated side marker do indicates 1969 model year.
Skid 2008-03-01 18:23	Really? Below is a 1968, and it has turn signals/parking lights in the bumper, and side markers. EDIT: Eh, sorry, just saw the "smaller" part before "side marker." It does indeed appear to be a 1969 model Chevelle. http://www.dragtimes.com/images/7323-1968-Chevrolet-Chevelle.jpg -- Last edit: 2008-03-01 18:58:49 (antp)
BeanBandit 2008-03-01 18:27	But 1969 model have parking lights in much inner position, like the picture car has. See: http://www.martinmtrs.com/img/1969_chevelle.jpg
rjluna2 2008-03-01 18:33	Skid wrote EDIT: Eh, sorry, just saw the "smaller" part before "side marker." It does indeed appear to be a 1969 model Chevelle. -- Last edit: 2008-03-01 18:34:30
car nerd 2008-03-02 06:44	It has a split grille. No Chevelle had one. I think it's a Canadian model. Sold by Pontiac in 1968/69. Don't recall the model name . I think this is the same car from the rear. vehicle_158941-Chevrolet-Chevelle-1967.html -- Last edit: 2008-03-02 06:46:03
car nerd 2008-03-02 07:06	Did some research and found some pics of a 1969 Pontiac Beaumont http://www.cardomain.com/ride/771114
BeanBandit 2008-03-02 13:38	Filming locations: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, so it is likely to be one. But what is the true name of the car, somewhere it is Pontiac Beaumont, somewhere it is just Beaumont, as brand?
antp 2008-03-02 17:56	Just as Beaumont it seems (cf comments on the other Beaumont page and on Wikipedia)
rjluna2 2008-03-02 18:21	Antp and car_nerd, you are right it is Canadian made Pontiac Beaumont. The grille design is different from 1969 Chevrolet Chevelle series. I think it the same vehicle as vehicle_158941-Chevrolet-Chevelle-1967.html . That taillight design threw me off. Opinions?
philr 2008-03-02 18:55	The Beaumont was sold by the Pontiac/Buick dealers, it had emblems very similar to those on Pontiacs as well as some Pontiac trim but it wasn't officially a Pontiac. However, most people here refer to these as Pontiac Beaumonts. While the full size canadian Pontiacs were Chevrolets with Pontiac body panels and interiors, the Beaumonts shared more exterior parts with the Chevelle than they did with the american Pontiac LeMans. The Beaumont and the LeMans had the same dashboard, it looked like a Pontiac inside.
Wampa-One 2008-03-04 03:34	Skid wrote Appears to be a 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle...from what I can see. rjluna2 wrote That looks more like Mopar car to me plymubishi wrote 1968 or 1969, if i remember correctly the 1967 chevelle was a bit longer Skid wrote Taillight visible looks like a 1967 taillight, though. car nerd wrote I'm farily sure it's the Canadian variant of the 1968/69 Chevelle. I have no idea what they were called Skid wrote 1967 Chevelle from a similar angle...notice the taillights. http://www.up22.com/ChevelleImages/1967ChevelleWhiteRear.jpg Beaumonts had different taillights in 1967...and WAY different taillights in 1968 and 1969. plymubishi wrote using that photo verifies that it is NOT a 1967, just as he said ...notice the taillights car nerd wrote 1966/67 Chevelle Malibu's had a "Flying Buttress" rear roof treatment. The car in the main pic has a flush-fitting rear window. Check out the link below. It's a 69 Beaumont and it seems to have identical taillight design. http://www.cardomain.com/ride/771114 Also, I am fairly sure this is the rear of the car in this pic: vehicle.php?id=158955 plymubishi wrote i agree with car nerd after seeing his links, but it is still not a 1967
Firebird86 2008-03-04 04:02	Its a 1969

Add a comment