Class: Cars, Coupé — Model origin: — Made for:
Minor action vehicle or used in only a short scene
Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2008-07-17 21:00 |
Funny to see Grodzka street before revitalisation with cars parked everywhere. |
◊ 2008-07-17 21:02 |
What's funny in it? |
◊ 2008-07-17 21:33 |
That not so long ago you could find such mess in quite representative place. Just behind these trees on the left is very important, antique church of Piotr i Paweł. |
◊ 2008-07-17 21:37 |
I thoink it's the same situation with Oławska street in Wroclaw. Before revitalisation there was a lot of cars and buildings was in poor condition )Olawska street is a connection between Market Square and Dominikanska galleery and big city communication change station. For now it's a promenade and mansions are revitalised too. http://wroclaw.hydral.com.pl/MDExMzE=,ulica.html -- Last edit: 2008-07-17 21:37:57 |
◊ 2008-07-17 23:25 |
Świetnie! Tak powinno być wszędzie. Niestety u nas w Wawie takie inwestycje (jak i inne) zdają się niewykonalne. Ostatnio skończyli Krk. Przedmiescie, ale akurat je, czy komuś się to podoba czy nie, zaczął L. Kaczyński po: Link to "www.przegubowiec.com" http://warszawa78.blox.pl/resource/krakowskie.jpg przed: /vehicle_170976-Renault-Dauphine-1956.html /vehicle_61812-Solaris-Urbino-15-1999.html -- Last edit: 2011-09-07 19:15:04 |
◊ 2008-07-18 09:05 |
Eeeeno, kozak bajera! |
◊ 2008-07-18 11:23 |
Parking never used to be a problem on Grodzka: BTW is this Św. Piotra i Pawła? Only it's been a long time, and my cataloguing may be unreliable: -- Last edit: 2008-07-18 11:23:34 |
◊ 2008-07-18 13:33 |
Your cataloguing might be unreliable, but obviously there's nothing wrong with your memory, Chris! Cf. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Krakau_PeteruPaul.jpg |
◊ 2008-07-18 17:29 |
Probably never before the 126p era But from the obvious reasons also the number of imported cars became bigger later. As always interesting pics especially the second one, where there is no fence with chartacteristic 12 figures. -- Last edit: 2008-07-18 18:03:37 |
◊ 2009-12-20 21:44 |
European version due to amber indicators. |
◊ 2009-12-20 22:06 |
1994-1997 Japanese version -- Last edit: 2011-11-22 09:41:11 |
◊ 2009-12-21 00:58 |
Guys, again, a homemade modification doesn't make the car for the European market, it most likely was brought here with its US specs and was modified to meet EU regulations, "rjluna" we've explained you a thousand of times now, but you seem to not want to understand it. |
◊ 2009-12-21 01:13 |
CCF, if you don't like my suggestion, I can take this comment off for you if you wish. |
◊ 2009-12-21 01:31 |
No need of seing yourself as being victimized, I was just telling you that not everytime you see a car with orange turn signals it'll be made for Europe, you know many were not sold here and when someone imports one from abroad the lights need to be modified, just trying to make you keep that in mind, we've explained you other times and you seem to forget it all the time, no need of deleting anything |
◊ 2009-12-21 01:49 |
It is something I don't normally see the amber indicator in a peculiar vehicles our country and that is why I pointed this out. I don't mean to offend you, CCF, about something that is out of ordinary on these vehicles for me. Of course, some of the vehicles in our country do have amber indicators and some don't. There are some legal definition in some states that will not allow amber indicator and required red lens instead. Just hear me out. |
◊ 2009-12-21 01:58 |
Amber rear turn signals have been permitted in all US states since the late 60's /early 70's |
◊ 2009-12-21 02:10 |
I'm not criticizing that you get surprised at it, but that you say "European version", it's not a European version, just a US one for which the turn signals have been modified by the guy or dealership that imported it, if a car has never been officially sold here how is it going to be a European version? unless this gen of the Mustang was, but I don't think so. Look, I'm going to show you something you will like, a Town Car with the rear lights modified to meet EU regulations, I photographed it a few weeks ago: |
◊ 2009-12-21 02:31 |
See? I love it |
◊ 2009-12-21 02:40 |
As CCF said, you have to be careful with your wording. I understand that you look out for things such as tailight lenses and that's just fine. It's "your thing" and there is not a problem. But the thing is that when you say something like "European version due to..." then it's implying that these are models built specifically for that country. As others have explained before, it is not always so simple. And most of the time, people can tell when the tailights are replacements or "non-US" so it does not necessarily have to be pointed out, especially when it is clear that the movie is foreign. In this case, the name of the movie, setting, other cars featured, and the license plate are a clear indicator of this. So just letting you know, be a bit more careful when posting such comments as they could be misinterpreted. |
◊ 2009-12-21 02:51 |
That is fine with me, ford_guy. I am always careful what to look before posting. If I am not really sure about the nuances of the certain vehicles, then I don't post my statement or I question about it. If I find something positively different from the other vehicles, then I would make the statement. |
◊ 2009-12-21 02:57 |
No offense rjluna! but why do I think that even after F_G's explanation you still don't get it? |
◊ 2009-12-21 03:04 |
Okay, I should have made this statement: I see amber indicator normally not found in USA. I am sorry for this misunderstanding. I am still learning how to say it gracefully. I do have trouble making a proper statement of these stuff I find sometimes. |
◊ 2009-12-21 03:10 |
Again, no offense (you have to understand that sometimes it's difficult to convey certain things over the internet and try not to sound like a mean person when doing so), but is it always necessary to point it out? I mean I can understand when you have a question about something, but if you're just pointing out a certain amber turn signal, which would not really be something out of the ordinary for European or maybe even other members, it gets to be a bit redundant (this unless we know for sure that a vehicle is made specifically for a certain market, in which case we can actually change the "Made for..." information). -- Last edit: 2009-12-21 03:11:11 |
◊ 2017-11-04 19:24 |
No one seemed to explain why this is a Japanese version beyond "it has orange indicators". Could be a third-party refit if the indicators don't comply with the Polish traffic code. I somehow highly doubt someone would specifically import a Japanese version to Poland... |
◊ 2017-11-04 20:28 |
Honestly it is more likely that the car was imported from Japan or Australia than it is that the taillights were brought over from those countries. Especially considering the taillights are painted body color (which would be a pain) and the rarity of the lights anyway, there is no aftermarket company that sold these lights and the only places that they were sold is Japan and Australia and in very small numbers... the car was imported into Poland anyway so why is it easier to believe it came from the US than Japan? If it were an importer just confirming to local laws then most likely they would have just installed small amber indicators on the bumper . |
◊ 2017-11-04 20:33 |
Because JDM cars aren't imported into Poland. They are found rather in the Ukraine and Belarus in small amounts, and can frequently be found in Russia, especially the Central Asian and Far Eastern parts. |
◊ 2017-11-05 12:28 |
This may actually be a EU version (you could custom order US Fords at most euro Ford dealers.) The Mustang actually had been a car that had to be specially ordered until they started officially selling it again a few years ago (I think after the Ford Cougar finished its run), so I think this could be Made for EU. |
◊ 2022-07-22 21:46 |
1994 confirmed by the plate (real). 1994 FORD (USA) Mustang Benzyna 4942 cm³ |