Author | Message |
---|---|
◊ 2006-08-04 03:07 |
LiAZ (Likinsky Avtobus Zavod) http://self.bus.ru/eng/liaz.htm -- Last edit: 2006-08-04 03:11:57 |
◊ 2006-08-04 16:56 |
Might be LiAZ 5256.25: http://bus.ruz.net/cars/ |
◊ 2006-08-04 16:59 |
By the way, this is Likinsky Avtobus Zavod in Russia, not the Czech Liaz. |
◊ 2006-08-04 17:09 |
So we should use "Likinsky Avtobus" instead of "LiAZ"? |
◊ 2006-08-04 17:13 |
Yes. |
◊ 2006-08-04 17:16 |
Better have one entry for LiAZ and one for Liaz. It sure won't be a problem for you, Antoine? |
◊ 2006-08-04 17:18 |
Sure... why not mix both together like we mix Triumph cars and Triumph bikes? |
◊ 2006-08-04 17:27 |
Unlike Triumph cars and motorbikes, they're completely unrelated companies. |
◊ 2006-08-04 17:50 |
LiAZ and Liaz are related? |
◊ 2006-08-04 18:14 |
No, they're not. |
◊ 2006-08-04 18:25 |
So it is like Triumph and Triumph |
◊ 2006-08-04 19:27 |
Antoine! Je t'assure qu'il n'y a aucun point commun entre Triumph/sous-vêtements féminins et Triumph/automobile... |
◊ 2006-08-04 19:28 |
Sauf qu'il me semble me souvenir que Triumph faisait au départ des machines à coudre? (ou alors je confonds...) -- Last edit: 2006-08-04 20:21:39 |
◊ 2006-08-04 19:59 |
Bah c'est bien ce que je dis... il me dit qu'ils sont not related, donc je dis que c'est like triumph... c'est une impression ou c'est un dialogue de sourds ici ? |
◊ 2006-08-04 20:04 |
Triomphe ou pas...moi ce que j'aime ces les machines à découdre -- Last edit: 2006-08-04 20:05:12 |
◊ 2006-08-05 00:06 |
Pas de pb, Antoine. C'était juste une "joke" pour te chambrer gentiment. J'aurai du mettre plus de smiley ... |
◊ 2006-08-07 15:38 |
All these Triumphs (bicycles, motor cycles, cars in England; bicycles, motor cycles, business machines, computer in Germany) have their roots in a company called 'Bettmann & Co', later renamed to 'Triumph Cycle Company'. Only 'Triumph International' has no connections. While the first produces toys for boys, the latter does it for girls ... well, at the end of the day those are for boys, too... But now, Antoine, you have successfully managed to get the focus away from the LiAZ / Liaz problem! I would vote for two entries. |
◊ 2006-08-07 16:05 |
Currently it is not possible to list them separatly anyway. So we can write them differently depending if it is the Russian or the Czech company, but they will be listed together anyway |
◊ 2006-08-07 16:43 |
Me too! Even if Antoine said that "they will be listed together anyway." |
◊ 2006-08-07 16:47 |
I still do not know if this one is LiAZ or Liaz... Well, I let you rename it if needed |
◊ 2007-05-08 14:36 |