Kommentare über diesen Film

Alle Kommentare zu diesem Film und seinen Fahrzeugen anschauen

Autor	Mitteilung
sixcyl ◊ 2008-03-12 21:08	I won't past "thousands" of girls pictures, some are quite "too hot" for this site , and would probably breed us in non stop comments ...just few of them Spoiler - click here to see it The mexican actress Francesca 'Kitten' Natividad , twice Miss Nude Universe ... and some others nice monsters -- Last edit: 2008-03-17 12:26:51 (antp)
antp ◊ 2008-03-12 22:36	sixcyl wrote ...just few of them And why not use the "spoiler" tag, added some time ago also for cases like that one then? (I do not say that for putting more pics, but for those already listed) -- Last edit: 2008-03-12 22:36:32
BeanBandit ◊ 2008-03-12 22:53	Truly a Russ Meyer film. Even the movie name is a dead-sure giveaway of the director identity.
Wampa-One ◊ 2008-03-13 03:19	Why do we even bother to have guidelines if they will not be followed? imcdb.org wrote Under no circumstance post pictures which, in any way, may be considered pornographic or unsuitable for viewing by the general public; including young children. /help.php
jettalover ◊ 2008-03-13 03:44	This disclaimer should be highlighted in red directly above the add a comment box.
sixcyl ◊ 2008-03-13 07:19	There is not any pornography in this
Alexander ◊ 2008-03-13 10:38	Now, come on, this is just B-quality act photography you find in every photo-magazine (not men's magazine!) or tv-programme guide at the news-stand of your local supermarket. Only countries with rather strange moralistic (suppressive) believes, like e.g. Iran, won't have this.
G-MANN ◊ 2008-03-13 11:23	Alexander wrote or tv-programme guide at the news-stand of your local supermarket. Maybe in some European countries, but I don't see stuff like this in the Radio Times! But yes, certain British tabloid newspapers always show topless girlie pictures (eg. Page 3 girls in The Sun) but they draw the line at showing "bush" (or perhaps it's the models that draw the line). Alexander wrote Only countries with rather strange moralistic (suppressive) believes, like e.g. Iran, won't have this. Not just places like Iran.... -- Last edit: 2008-03-13 11:34:39
Gag Halfrunt ◊ 2008-03-13 12:10	The only way to resolve this problem is probably to have a simple no-nudity rule, which would put an end to arguments about what is and is not "pornographic".
G-MANN ◊ 2008-03-13 12:30	Um, we do.
carchasesfanatic ◊ 2008-03-13 12:36	Using the spoiler is easy, anybody who wants to see it just click on it and sees it, if not, then its hidden
G-MANN ◊ 2008-03-13 12:58	That would be the best thing to do But if we want to keep guidelines, then perhaps we should rewrite that one guideline about pornographic images (because it still allows opportunity for debate), changing it to: "No naked breasts or genitalia". That may not quite use the language of political-correctness that rules are usually written in, but it's far more straightfoward.
Alexander ◊ 2008-03-13 13:41	Some extra rules or regulations written somewhere by someone won't change a thing. If the goal is to protect under-aged surfers from nudity we have to shut down the internet completely. It is so bloody easy finding pornographic images or video clip on the net, even if you look for something completely different. Only yesterday I searched for 'Pegaso' images using the Google image search engine. The very first result was not a truck! If the goal is to protect yourself from seeing nudity (I'd be a bit amazed) or if you want to make sure your wife doesn't get a wrong idea if you tell her you are looking at cars and all she sees is naked women, then the use of a spoiler tag is a good idea. As a under-aged protection scheme the spoiler tag is useless, even counter-productive. So, just stay cool. And, Jean-Marc, perhaps you could use the spoiler tag to protect our other members/admins from their less understanding better halves --- And now be honest: how many of you have just searched for Pegaso images?
G-MANN ◊ 2008-03-13 13:45	Alexander wrote or if you want to make sure your wife doesn't get a wrong idea if you tell her you are looking at cars and all she sees is naked women Or your boss/supervisor.... Alexander wrote As a under-aged protection scheme the spoiler tag is useless, even counter-productive. How is it counter-productive? -- Last edit: 2008-03-13 13:52:33
Alexander ◊ 2008-03-13 13:57	G-MANN wrote Or your boss/supervisor.... G-MANN wrote How is it counter-productive? Something that is forbidden is most attractive to children and teens. A spoiler tag is certainly the first thing a surfer-kid would click on.
G-MANN ◊ 2008-03-13 13:59	Now I see what you mean. I thought you meant it would be counter-productive to the site.
G-MANN ◊ 2008-03-13 14:10	Alexander wrote If the goal is to protect under-aged surfers from nudity we have to shut down the internet completely. It is so bloody easy finding pornographic images or video clip on the net You know, with me it wasn't so much that the pornographic imagery was a problem (and I came of age a good while ago), rather that porn sites are where all the seedy people on the internet lurk, who tend to put viruses all the over the place, so a hardcore porn site is a place where you're likely to get attacked by viruses and spyware, this is why I mostly tend to stay away from them (sometimes it just isn't worth it). This is really why my dad didn't want me using his computer to look at internet porn (and I don't know how it was with other people but for me it's plain embarrassing when your parents find out!! ). But sixcyl's imageshack images don't pose that kind of threat. -- Last edit: 2008-03-13 14:14:35
carchasesfanatic ◊ 2008-03-13 14:15	Alexander wrote Some extra rules or regulations written somewhere by someone won't change a thing. If the goal is to protect under-aged surfers from nudity we have to shut down the internet completely. Well but as a spanish saying says "if the other one throws to the river himself you do too" ? that's not an excuse, just because other sites have this we dont have to have it, its not the purpose of this site, it is just, lets say, pointless to have it here, if someone wants to see nudity there are other pages for it, but i think this depends on each of us, afterall, we all sometimes do what we want and dont follow the guidelines, or am i wrong? ones keep tiny background vehicles, others keep nudity, others keep with useless comments etc etc, so it has to be each of us who decide what to add or not, well, unless it is something very wrong in where a decision with Antoine has to be taken, but i dont think we have any special case now. Alexander wrote Only yesterday I searched for 'Pegaso' images using the Google image search engine. The very first result was not a truck! haha
G-MANN ◊ 2008-03-13 14:19	carchasesfanatic wrote "if the other one throws to the river himself you do too" ? We have that phrase too, but usually it's "If they jumped off a bridge would you do too?" -- Last edit: 2008-03-13 14:19:29
carchasesfanatic ◊ 2008-03-13 14:33	Oh good to know thanks
58Roadmaster ◊ 2008-03-13 14:48	G-MANN wrote Not just places like Iran.... Well that's one thing that Iran and the U.S. have in common!
antp ◊ 2008-03-13 14:53	Alexander wrote A spoiler tag is certainly the first thing a surfer-kid would click on. I do not care of that: people who click are warned. At least one does not get these images "by surprise"* directly when arriving on the page when surfing from a public place or if being easily offended. (* if you surf on a erotic site, you know what you'll get, but people who surf here do not especially expect that...) As it seems so difficult to not post such pics on a car-related site, I added that spoiler tag to at least hide them by default, but even that seems asking too much. Wampa-One wrote Why do we even bother to have guidelines if they will not be followed? He does not follow them for background cars, why follow them for other stuff? -- Last edit: 2008-03-13 15:28:12
carchasesfanatic ◊ 2008-03-13 15:10	And if you edit yourself his comments?
antp ◊ 2008-03-13 15:22	carchasesfanatic wrote we all sometimes do what we want and dont follow the guidelines, or am i wrong? Yeah, if nobody follows guidelines I do not see why G-MANN forbids me posting background SAABs
carchasesfanatic ◊ 2008-03-13 16:29	He doesnt let you add background SAABs?
antp ◊ 2008-03-13 17:56	It was a joke based on few past events: /yourcomments.php?archiveformovie=416320 (cf also the two links at the end) -- Last edit: 2008-03-13 17:57:10
carchasesfanatic ◊ 2008-03-13 18:30	this G-MANN is very mean!
G-MANN ◊ 2008-03-13 18:50	I don't have the power to forbid antp to do anything! Anyway that particular Saab can already be seen on the site /vehicle_13616-Jaguar-XJR-X350-2004.html, the other picture was just a cropped version of that image! -- Last edit: 2008-03-13 18:52:36
samyuk ◊ 2008-03-13 22:30	G-MANN wrote Or your boss/supervisor.... I didn't think we are supposed to do this at work when someone else, likely innocent consumers ultimately, or tax payers if we work for the government, are paying for our time How is it counter-productive? -- Last edit: 2008-03-13 22:32:27
G-MANN ◊ 2008-03-14 12:22	I know at work you're supposed to be working, but have you ever heard of downtime? I used to work for the Ordnance Survey, and when I downloaded new areas of map, it used to take up to 10 minutes, sometimes even more! Until they got faster computers. But I didn't go on the internet then (it was blocked), I tended to read the newspaper. And there's also lunch breaks. -- Last edit: 2008-03-14 12:23:38
carchasesfanatic ◊ 2008-03-14 12:27	What's Ordnance Survey?
G-MANN ◊ 2008-03-14 12:35	http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/
carchasesfanatic ◊ 2008-03-14 12:41	Oh, so a place where you go to buy maps?
G-MANN ◊ 2008-03-14 12:42	A company that makes maps.
sixcyl ◊ 2008-03-14 12:56	antp wrote And why not use the "spoiler" tag, added some time ago also for cases like that one then? (I do not say that for putting more pics, but for those already listed) spoiler tag ? ...hmm , in fact I don't know what it is , but I live very well with that lack
antp ◊ 2008-03-14 14:25	Spoiler - click here to see it some text/images the code: /edit-comment.php?id=401607&movie=78846 I added that some time ago, at the same time as other few new things, there was a message at the top of the pages with a link to the forum to announce that. cf http://forum.imcdb.org/forum_topic-2975-Site_changes_of_2007_11_24.html -- Last edit: 2008-03-14 14:27:14
samyuk ◊ 2008-03-14 21:58	G-MANN wrote I know at work you're supposed to be working, but have you ever heard of downtime? I used to work for the Ordnance Survey, and when I downloaded new areas of map, it used to take up to 10 minutes, sometimes even more! Until they got faster computers. But I didn't go on the internet then (it was blocked), I tended to read the newspaper. And there's also lunch breaks. I have heard of downtime and lunch time, but have you heard of compromising a company's network and having data fished out of the system through inappropriate internet use. I made my comment not because I am against doing this at work, G-Mann or any person posting anything. I made the comment because there are many ways of looking at the same issues and we must within some broader limit respect other people's choices. I participate at this web site for a little while and I think we all have been very disciplined. -- Last edit: 2008-03-14 23:23:39

	Fahrzeug ist Teil des Films
	Häufig von einem Hauptdarsteller benutztes Fahrzeug oder Fahrzeug mit spezieller Bedeutung
	Von einem Darsteller oder bei einer Verfolgungsjagd benutztes Fahrzeug
	Fahrzeug mit geringer Beteiligung oder nur in einer Szene sichtbar
	Fahrzeug im Hintergrund
	Unbekannte Rolle des Fahrzeugs
	Seen only in preview/trailer
	Seen only in deleted scenes
	Seen only in an alternative ending
	Seen only in an extra DVD contents

Werbung

Zuletzt erstellte Filmseiten

Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens, Kinofilm, 1979

Kommentare über diesen Film

Kommentar hinzufügen