Spider-Man, Movie, 2002

Pictures provided by: antp, der.krusche, tonkatracker

Also known as:

Spiderman

1978 Buick Regal

1971 Cadillac Fleetwood Eldorado

2000 Chevrolet Impala

Chevrolet Step Van

1992 Ford Aerostar

1992 Ford Crown Victoria

2001 Ford Mustang

International Harvester 4700

1968 International Harvester Loadstar 1600

1988 Mercury Cougar

1987 Nissan Sentra

1973 Oldsmobile Delta 88

2000 Plymouth Prowler

1987 Plymouth Voyager

Rolls-Royce Phantom V

2000 Saturn SL2

Seagrave

1992 Suzuki Sidekick

1993 Toyota Corolla

1983 Volvo 240

Comments about this movie

See all comments about this movie and its vehicles

Author	Message
antp ◊ 2005-12-13 23:58	Lots of cars visible as drawing when Peter searches for a car:
sixcyl ◊ 2005-12-14 00:03	Une Healey pour moins de 4000$! une TR2 à 5000, une Guilia Junior à 3000!...je rêve
antp ◊ 2005-12-14 00:06	TR3, pas TR2 Puis "needs restoration"... il faut se méfier
sixcyl ◊ 2005-12-14 01:31	Puis "needs restoration"... il faut se méfier ...de toute façon avec une anglaise, c'est un pléonasme!
der.krusche ◊ 2006-11-22 21:14	not to be spotted, BUT ... a car ... -- Last edit: 2006-11-22 21:16:27
der.krusche ◊ 2006-11-22 21:17	is this t-bird-phantasy the wet dream of youngsters who are going to marry?
Alexander ◊ 2006-11-22 22:33	der.krusche wrote not to be spotted, BUT ... a car ... You can list it, its a Mini! vehicle_29076-Mini-ADO20-1975.html
antp ◊ 2006-11-22 22:42	I am not sure it is worth listing it
Alexander ◊ 2006-11-22 22:47	antp wrote I am not sure it is worth listing it I remember a few that were far more difficult to identify. And we have many cars listed where less is visible. So, why not?
antp ◊ 2006-11-22 22:55	It is not the difficult of identification (as you identified it) but the role in the movie. For 2-star or more it is worth adding cars that are not very visible, but when they have no role in the movie (and in this case the car isn't even itself in the movie) I do not see the point of listing it.
Alexander ◊ 2006-11-22 23:11	antp wrote It is not the difficult of identification (as you identified it) ... ... even I! antp wrote ... I do not see the point of listing it. It's a car. It's in a movie. Background car -- backgrounmd info. That's all, nothing more. More interesting would be: who is that girl?
antp ◊ 2006-11-22 23:29	Alexander wrote ... even I! Well I wanted to say that the reason of listing a car is not based on how difficult/easy it is to identify it Alexander wrote It's a car. It's in a movie. Background car -- backgrounmd info. That's all, nothing more. But we can't list all background cars. If it is not visible for long time, not well visible or not rare, what is the reason of listing that one rather than another one? e.g. why not list the white Toyota on the Impala picture, the MPV on the Mustang picture, the Ford taxi on the Olds picture, etc. -- Last edit: 2006-11-22 23:30:01
Alexander ◊ 2006-11-23 00:46	antp wrote Well I wanted to say that the reason of listing a car is not based on how difficult/easy it is to identify it ... I know, I am just teasing you! antp wrote But we can't list all background cars. ... No need to explain, I know your feelings about this subject. For me it is enough to have it in the comments, as we have it now. But that is probably true for half the one-star cars! On the other hand I understand why even such cars find their way into the one-star category. For a real fan it is quite thrilling to see your beloved marque in a film, no matter how short. What would you have written had it been a De Lorean? Be honest!
der.krusche ◊ 2006-11-23 07:57	>> For me it is enough to have it in the comments, as we have it now. << this is, how I understood it. not to be listed, but maybe interesting to be seen, should be put in the comment-line. :-)) martin
antp ◊ 2006-11-23 11:40	Alexander wrote What would you have written had it been a De Lorean? Be honest! If it was a DeLorean it would have fall in the "rare" category as mentionned in my previous message And, yes, several of the one-star cars of the site do not have really reasons of being listed (and I often post comments about that ) -- Last edit: 2006-11-23 11:41:04
elessar ◊ 2007-03-02 15:46	La meilleur adaptation Comic à ce jour! Vivement le troisième!

	The vehicle is part of the movie
	Vehicle used a lot by a main character or for a long time
	Vehicle used by a character or in a car chase
	Minor action vehicle or used in only a short scene
	Background vehicle
	Unknown vehicle role
	Seen only in preview/trailer
	Seen only in deleted scenes
	Seen only in an alternative ending
	Seen only in an extra DVD contents

Advertising

Last completed movie pages

Spider-Man, Movie, 2002

Comments about this movie

Add a comment